Stay granted in Chaoulli decision

Sibbald, Barbara
August 2005
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;8/30/2005, Vol. 173 Issue 5, p474
Academic Journal
Reports on the judgment of the Canadian Supreme Court in the Chaoulli case which affected Quebec's ban on private health insurance. Argument of Quebec concerning the case; Stand of a British Columbia group on the case.


Related Articles

  • Two court cases put crack in HIPAA privacy wall. Campbell, Joel // Quill;Sep2006, Vol. 94 Issue 7, p15 

    This article discusses two court cases, which put a crack in the privacy wall of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. The Texas court of Appeals ruled that the United States federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act does not trump the Texas open...

  • Relationships -- I. Jacobs, Marvin A. // Elevator World;Jan2010, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p76 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the injured plaintiff, an employee of an air-conditioning company, sued KF-America and other defendants because of an elevator accident. The trial court rejected the analysis of KF-America concerning the liability for non-economic damages. The Court of...

  • Loss Claim.  // Accountancy;Apr1969, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p283 

    This section reports on the decision of the Court of Appeal on the case Wood Preservation Ltd. versus Prior in Great Britain in 1968.

  • Purchase and Sale of Silver.  // Accountancy;Apr1969, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p280 

    This article discusses a case about the purchase and sale of silver, Chamberlain versus Wisdom at the Court of Appeal in Great Britain in 1968. It was a significant feature of the case that it was not intended that the taxpayer should realize his assets, his house, his government securities, his...

  • "I Tax Dead People" -- Texas Court of Appeals Holds that Prepaid Funeral Benefits Trusts' Earnings Derived from Out-of-State Investments Are Included in Texas Gross Receipts. Cox, Jeremy; Lyda, Kirk R. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the case Anderson-Clayton Bros. Funeral Home, Inc. v. Stryhorn wherein the 3rd District of the Texas Court of Appeals held that earnings from investments in out-of-state investment are subject to Texas gross receipts for the earned surplus component, if such investments are...

  • No reliance on case rule. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Jul1992, Vol. 110 Issue 1187, p98 

    This article discusses the ruling a British Court of Appeal on the case Vaughan and Others versus Barlow Clowes International (BCI) and Others. Several investors appealed to the Court of Appeal, contending that all investors who contributed to the two portfolios were contributing to common funds...

  • The value of trust investment falls. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Jul1992, Vol. 110 Issue 1187, p97 

    This article focuses on decision by the British Court of Appeal on the case Nestle versus National Westminster Bank plc that unless a trustee can ben shown to be in default, he is not liable for a fall in the value of a trust fund, even though there has been failure carry out regular reviews of...

  • ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN TRAVEL BROCHURE HELD BINDING- LOUISIANA--LOCALE--LSA--R.S. §9:4201--WAIVER.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun78, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p54 

    The article informs that an arbitration clause contained in a travel brochure was held binding on the parties even though no written, signed instrument containing the arbitration provision was entered into between the parties. Plaintiff commenced a breach of contract action, alleging that it had...

  • Court of Appeals says 'no' to B&O. Herreras, Mari // Wenatchee Business Journal;Dec2005, Vol. 19 Issue 12, pA1 

    The article cites that the Washington State Court of Appeals, Division III affirmed a state court ruling from 2004 that determined a Spokane resident was wrongly assessed a surcharge by an automotive dealership. The surcharge was added to the plaintiff's car purchase to pay the company's...

  • Supreme Court deals publishers blow. McCabe-Lokos, Nick // Quill & Quire;May2004, Vol. 70 Issue 5, p4 

    At the beginning of March 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled unanimously against three legal publishers namely CCH Canadian, Canada Law Book, and Carswell, who had sought to block the Law Society's library from copying material for patrons for a fee. The court ruled that the Law Society's...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics