Stay granted in Chaoulli decision

Sibbald, Barbara
August 2005
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;8/30/2005, Vol. 173 Issue 5, p474
Academic Journal
Reports on the judgment of the Canadian Supreme Court in the Chaoulli case which affected Quebec's ban on private health insurance. Argument of Quebec concerning the case; Stand of a British Columbia group on the case.


Related Articles

  • Two court cases put crack in HIPAA privacy wall. Campbell, Joel // Quill;Sep2006, Vol. 94 Issue 7, p15 

    This article discusses two court cases, which put a crack in the privacy wall of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. The Texas court of Appeals ruled that the United States federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act does not trump the Texas open...

  • In re Interest of Brittany C. vs. Nona M..  // Native American Law Digest;May2005, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p13 

    The article focuses on the court case "Interest of Brittany C. vs. Nona M." The Court of Appeals of Nebraska affirmed a trial court's decision not to transfer jurisdiction over a neglect petition to tribal court in a case where the children had been enrolled in the Oglala Sioux Tribe during the...

  • Relationships -- I. Jacobs, Marvin A. // Elevator World;Jan2010, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p76 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the injured plaintiff, an employee of an air-conditioning company, sued KF-America and other defendants because of an elevator accident. The trial court rejected the analysis of KF-America concerning the liability for non-economic damages. The Court of...

  • Loss Claim.  // Accountancy;Apr1969, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p283 

    This section reports on the decision of the Court of Appeal on the case Wood Preservation Ltd. versus Prior in Great Britain in 1968.

  • Agent Representation Held Binding; No Damage, No Coverage With Business Risk; Named Insured Can Bring Third Party Action. Harkavy, Jon // Risk Management (00355593);Apr85, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p16 

    This article discusses several court decisions affecting risk managers as of April 1985. The case Darner Motor Sales Inc. vs. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., decided by the Arizona Supreme Court, involved a commercial insured who was mislead about the coverage it was provided by the...

  • Texas Court of Appeals Rejects Physician's Claim for Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Edmonds, John // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Texas Court of Appeals regarding the case Laredo Medical Group v. Lightner. The court decided that the no special relationship exists between a medical group and one of its physician employees in a manner that will impose a duty of good faith and fair...

  • "I Tax Dead People" -- Texas Court of Appeals Holds that Prepaid Funeral Benefits Trusts' Earnings Derived from Out-of-State Investments Are Included in Texas Gross Receipts. Cox, Jeremy; Lyda, Kirk R. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the case Anderson-Clayton Bros. Funeral Home, Inc. v. Stryhorn wherein the 3rd District of the Texas Court of Appeals held that earnings from investments in out-of-state investment are subject to Texas gross receipts for the earned surplus component, if such investments are...

  • No Final Answer. Schiavoni III, Tancred V.; Marden, David // Best's Review;May2008, Vol. 109 Issue 1, p92 

    The article discusses the legal challenges confronting asbestos bankruptcy litigation in the U.S. It notes the lack of a legal framework in the judiciary system to resolve disputes involving asbestos bankruptcies. In addition, it discusses the decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals over...

  • No reliance on case rule. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Jul1992, Vol. 110 Issue 1187, p98 

    This article discusses the ruling a British Court of Appeal on the case Vaughan and Others versus Barlow Clowes International (BCI) and Others. Several investors appealed to the Court of Appeal, contending that all investors who contributed to the two portfolios were contributing to common funds...

  • The value of trust investment falls. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Jul1992, Vol. 110 Issue 1187, p97 

    This article focuses on decision by the British Court of Appeal on the case Nestle versus National Westminster Bank plc that unless a trustee can ben shown to be in default, he is not liable for a fall in the value of a trust fund, even though there has been failure carry out regular reviews of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics