TITLE

The dangers of judging managers by their peers

AUTHOR(S)
Fletcher, Clive
PUB. DATE
August 1997
SOURCE
People Management;8/28/1997, Vol. 3 Issue 17, p50
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the 360-degree feedback systems in which a manager is rated on various competencies by subordinates, peers, bosses and clients. Use of feedback systems for development purposes; Trend on the use of the feedback systems for appraisals; Disadvantages of the use of 360-degree feedback systems.
ACCESSION #
1785372

 

Related Articles

  • Individual Performance Isn't a Solo Activity. Bain, Victoria // Journal for Quality & Participation;Fall2001, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p32 

    Provides information on co-performance measurement between employees and managers. Details of the myth of solo performance or one-sided performance appraisals; Features of co-performance appraisal; How to initiate co-performance appraisal.

  • Altering the Genetic Code of Management Review. Lacey, Travis // Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology;Jul/Aug2004, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p310 

    Focuses on management review process. Metrics presented at a management review; Benefits of management reviews.

  • Get Feedback On Your Performance.  // Successful Supervisor;May2013, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p3 

    The article discusses the effective methods to get employees speak up on the performance of their supervisors through asking the four questions about the supervisors' management style.

  • The inadequate manager: Warnings don't help. Burger, Chester // Management Review;Dec72, Vol. 61 Issue 12, p31 

    Discusses the effect of warnings on poor job performance of managers in the U.S. Difficulty in changing habits; Lack of objectivity in self-evaluation.

  • A 6-Part Structure for Giving Clear and Actionable Feedback. Goldsmith, Marshall // Harvard Business Review Digital Articles;8/7/2015, p2 

    The article presents the six basic questions that comprise the off-the-shelf structure that enabled a manager to give clear and actionable feedback from employees and allowed him to successfully change his own behavior and his team's behavior.

  • Tucson employees say their bosses are the best. Knuhtsen, Cheryl // Inside Tucson Business;12/1/2003, Vol. 13 Issue 21, pB4 

    Reports on the affirmation of Tucson employees that their bosses are the best. Factors that made them honored; Qualities they possess; Remarks of the employees.

  • Give Your Boss an A+.  // Women in Business;Jul/Aug90, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p5 

    This article reports on a Gallup Poll which found that employees generally give their bosses high ratings. The majority of employees polled said their bosses treated them fairly and honestly and listened to their problems. Part-time employees were more likely than full-time workers to rate their...

  • SMA Scorecard.  // Money Management Executive;9/26/2005, Vol. 13 Issue 36, p12 

    Presents the charts depicting the top performing SMA program managers that ranked in one-year trailing as of 2005 in the U.S.

  • We Can't All Be Above Average. Colvin, Geoffrey // Fortune;8/13/2001, Vol. 144 Issue 3, p48 

    Focuses on the forced-ranking method of evaluating management whereby under-performing managers are fired. Attempts to use this method at Ford Motor Company, Microsoft Corp. and Conoco; Recommendation for adopting this method; Difficulty and necessity of firing managers within contemporary...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics