TITLE

The Constitution of Babel

AUTHOR(S)
Smith, Steven D.
PUB. DATE
January 1998
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Jan1998, Issue 79, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Compares the constitutional decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court to the biblical legend of Tower of Babel. Overview of the biblical legend; Central role of pride in constitutional law; Manifestation of pride in the decision in the Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania versus Casey.
ACCESSION #
17771528

 

Related Articles

  • TEXT, PRECEDENT, AND THE CONSTITUTION: SOME ORIGINALIST AND NORMATIVE ARGUMENTS FOR OVERRULING PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. CASEY. Calabresi, Steven G. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2005, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p311 

    The article argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should follow the text of the Constitution, as originally understood, rather than its own precedents, where there is clear conflict between the two. The claim is defended using originalist and normative arguments. The approach is applied to the U.S....

  • When the Court Should Not Be Obeyed. Hittinger, Russell // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct1993, Issue 36, p12 

    Analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania versus Casey concerning abortion. Views of Republican government officials on the case; Implications of the case for conservatives in the area of electoral politics; Significance of the decision of the court to the...

  • JUDICIAL REVIEW OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS: DOES MARBURY'S HOLDING APPLY IN A POST-WARREN COURT WORLD? Eastman, John C. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2005, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p713 

    Analyzes the constitutional jurisprudence of unenumerated rights based on the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in the Marbury v. Madison case which firmly entrenched judicial review as a fundamental component of the government's constitutional system. Scope of judicial supremacy among the...

  • The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Jurisprudence of Class. Mariner, Wendy K. // American Journal of Public Health;Nov92, Vol. 82 Issue 11, p1556 

    The US Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey both protects a woman's liberty to choose to terminate her pregnancy and permits the state to make it more difficult for her to exercise her choice. In their opinion on the case, Justices O'Connor,...

  • A Crisis of Legitimacy. Hittinger, Russell // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov1996, Issue 67, p25 

    Focuses on the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court. Connection of abortion with the legitimacy of the court in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey Supreme Court case; Obedience of elected representative of the U.S. government to the Court's understanding of the constitutional order; Views on the...

  • Planned Parenthood vs. Casey (1992).  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents the United States Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania vs. Robert Casey, the Governor of Pennsylvania which was decided in June 1992. How five provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 were examined; Citing of the Roe v. Wade case;...

  • The new constitutional covenant. Bradley, Gerard V. // World & I;Mar94, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p358 

    Focuses on the watershed 1992 abortion decision on the Supreme Court case, Planned parenthood v. Casey. Effects of Thurgood Marshall's papers; Importance of `Casey'; Court as conscience of the nation; Majority intolerance; Constitutional deconstructionist; Affirming personal liberation...

  • PROTECTING THE ONE PERCENT: RELEVANT WOMEN, UNDUE BURDENS, AND UNWORKABLE JUDICIAL BYPASSES. Rex, Alexandra // Columbia Law Review;Jan2014, Vol. 114 Issue 1, p85 

    The purpose of this Note is to analyze one widely enacted category of abortion regulations--parental involvement laws--and the effect of such regulations on their targeted group--pregnant minors. According to the Supreme Court, abortion regulations are constitutional only if they satisfy the...

  • If the Purpose Fits: The Two Functions of Casey's Purpose Inquiry. Smith, Priscilla J. // Washington & Lee Law Review;Spring2014, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p1135 

    An essay is presented on the two reported functions of a purpose inquiry in legal cases involving the constitutionality of abortion regulations or laws in America as of 2014, focusing on a two-pronged undue burden test which was applied in the 1992 abortion-related U.S. Supreme Court case...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics