TITLE

WHILE WE'RE AT IT

AUTHOR(S)
Neuhaus, Richard John
PUB. DATE
August 1997
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Aug/Sep1997, Issue 75, p84
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on a directive issued by the U.S. Department of Defense forbidding chaplains to urge folk to write Congress on the partial-birth abortion ban.
ACCESSION #
17771154

 

Related Articles

  • Conferees Struggle on Defense Bill. Scully, Megan; Smallen, Jill; Mitchell, Charlie // National Journal;9/23/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 38, p75 

    The article reports on the failure of the U.S. House-Senate conferees to reach a final compromise on the unresolved issues in the fiscal 2007 Defense authorization bill. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner remained in...

  • Unnecessary extrafighter engine: $3 billion defense spending waste. Loh, John Michael // Hill;5/25/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 58, p32 

    In this article, the author focuses on the issue about the decision of the U.S. Congress to whether to continue the funding of a defense program called alternate engine.

  • Training military chaplains.  // National Catholic Reporter;7/5/2013, Vol. 49 Issue 19, p3 

    The article informs that chaplains received training for counseling gay servicemen and servicewomen and, also about their role in interacting with victims of sexual assault under the U.S. Department of Defense "Don't ask, don't tell" policy.

  • Resolution against the Machine. Athey, Jean; Feffer, John // Foreign Policy in Focus;10/14/2011, p1 

    The article reports on a resolution proposed by Peace Action Montgomery of Alabama urging the U.S. Congress to reduce the Defense Department budget in a manner that does not harm the safety or lives of troops. The controversy surrounding the resolution is about its potential hazards. Economists...

  • Immodest proposal: Cutting military spending. Hecht, James L. // Christian Century;05/12/99, Vol. 116 Issue 15, p537 

    Discusses the reduction of military expenditures in the United States (US) for the needs of the citizens at home and abroad. Reasons for the high expenditures of the US Department of Defense; military; Views on the reason for the approval of the military budget at the United States Congress;...

  • Pentagon Expected To Submit Budget Without War Funding Request.  // Defense Daily;1/22/2008, Vol. 237 Issue 13, p4 

    The article reports that the U.S. Defense Department is not expected to honor U.S. Congress' request to deliver a supplemental budget request for fiscal year 2009 when it submits its overall budget on February 4, 2008, according to House and Senate aides. If the Pentagon holds back the...

  • Congress questions Tricare risk sharing. Gardner, Jonathan // Modern Healthcare;5/27/96, Vol. 26 Issue 22, p13 

    Reports on the United States Congress' questioning of a Defense Department plan to make military healthcare facilities share some of the risk of managed-care contracts. Military retirees and dependents' enrollment in the Tricare managed-care plans; Calls for the testing of the risk-sharing...

  • Senate should join House to curb defense `welfare'. Korb, Lawrence J. // Christian Science Monitor;9/12/96, Vol. 88 Issue 202, p19 

    Opinion. Calls for the US Senate to support the House of Representatives in its efforts to end the government subsidies given by the administration of President Bill Clinton to defense mergers and acquisitions. Problem with the inflated and unverifiable projected savings from the practice.

  • Pentagon can bear cuts, but Congress must fix entitlements. Gordon, J. D. // Hill;3/20/2013, Vol. 20 Issue 33, p30 

    The article reports on the need for the U.S. Congress to fix entitlements with sequestration to be faced by the Department of Defense (DOD).

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics