End No-Fault Divorce?

Whitehead, Barbara Dafoe
August 1997
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Aug/Sep1997, Issue 75, p27
Opposes the idea of ending the no-fault divorce law. Disadvantages of adding a fault requirement in a divorce law; Argument of the proponents of the fault requirement; Consequences of divorce.


Related Articles

  • INTRODUCTION: LAMBERT AND LAMPPOSTS: THE END OF EQUALITY IN ANGLO-AUSTRALIAN MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY LAW? Ingleby, Richard // International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family;Aug2005, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p137 

    This contribution introduces the volume by classifying the collection into 3 categories: (i) examinations of the area of property law which focus on the relationship between the decisions in White, Figgins and Lambert (ii) reactions to the implications of McFarlane, Parlour for the evolution of...

  • End No-Fault Divorce? Gallagher, Maggie // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Aug/Sep1997, Issue 75, p24 

    Supports the idea of ending the no-fault divorce law. Primary purpose of no-fault divorce; Key component of personal happiness; Benefits provided by no-fault divorce; Relationships between the embrace of no-fault divorce and the rise of divorce cases.

  • Modern divorce is a sad comedy. Dolan, Philippa // Lawyer;3/11/2013, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p8 

    The article focuses on why all jurisdictions in Great Britain should introduce no-fault divorce options. Topics include the challenges that come with defended divorce, the use of unreasonable behavior as a reason for the divorce, and why British politicians are reluctant to introduce no-fault...

  • NEW YORK AND DIVORCE: FINDING FAULT IN A NO FAULT SYSTEM. Guidice, Lauren // Journal of Law & Policy;2011, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p787 

    The article focuses on the enactment of a no-fault divorce system in New York. It explores the historical development of the divorce law and the fault-based system under New York's Domestic Relations Law. Under the New York's divorce reform law, an unhappy spouse who declares that his or her...

  • THE MISGUIDED MOVEMENT TO REVIVE FAULT DIVORCE, AND WHY REFORMERS SHOULD LOOK INSTEAD TO THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE. Ellman, Ira Mark // International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family;Aug1997, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p216 

    Many American states allow unilateral no-fault divorce without significant waiting periods, and typically these states also exclude consideration of marital misconduct in the determination of financial awards at divorce. In recent years these laws have come under increasing criticism in both...

  • ‘So Hedge therefore, Who Join Forever’: Understanding the Interrelation of No-fault Divorce and Premarital Contracts. FRANCK, JENS-UWE // International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family;Dec2009, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p235 

    This article explores the interrelation between the availability of no-fault divorce and the enforceability of premarital contracts, exemplified by American and German law. The traditional common law doctrines in the USA and – at least with regard to spousal support – the German...

  • VOW FOR NOW. Plunkett, Robert L. // National Review;5/29/1995, Vol. 47 Issue 10, p48 

    The article discusses the role of no-fault divorce on the failure of marriages in the U.S. The grounds for divorce were originally narrow and directly related to the marriage contract. It was granted when an innocent party sued a guilty one. Under the fault divorce system, the innocent spouse...

  • New York Legislators Supports Marriage Recognition While Legislating No-Fault Divorce. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2010, p135 

    The article reports on a New York Assembly committee memo accompanying the no-fault divorce bill signed by New York Governor David Paterson which takes care to avoid implications that by using the terms "husband" and "wife," the legislature might be seen as undermining state court opinions...

  • DIVORCE LIBERATION. Senior, Jennifer // New York;6/28/2010, Vol. 43 Issue 21, p20 

    The article examines why New York was the last state to permit no-fault divorce that allows couples to dissolve their marriage without the need for one party to be at fault. It is pointed out that aside from the Catholic Church, liberal constituencies like the National Organization for Women had...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics