TITLE

Evolution

AUTHOR(S)
Acomb, Deborah L.
PUB. DATE
July 2005
SOURCE
National Journal;7/16/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 29, p2320
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the results of two surveys conducted by Harris Interactive and "Newsweek" magazine regarding creationism and human evolution in the U.S. as of July 16, 2005. Fraction of the respondents who believed that human beings were created directly by God; Percentage of respondents who believed on the intelligent-design theory, a proposal that human beings are complex that some intelligence must have guided their development; Number of respondents who said that both creationism and evolution should be taught in schools.
ACCESSION #
17756833

Tags: CREATIONISM;  EVOLUTION (Biology);  PERSONS;  GOD;  INTELLIGENT design (Teleology);  SCHOOLS

 

Related Articles

  • Teaching Evolution: An Overview. Aliprandini, Michael; McMahon, Maureen // Points of View: Teaching Evolution;2011, p1 

    The article examines the debate over the teaching of evolution or creationism in U.S. public schools. Evolutionary theory proposes that the development of life is a process which has been occurring over billions of years, leading to the diversity of life forms on earth, while creationism...

  • Creationism still alive and kicking in US public schools. Farrell, John // New Scientist;10/23/2010, Vol. 208 Issue 2783, p01 

    The article focuses on the teaching of creationism in U.S. public schools despite the landmark court case that banished intelligent design from Pennsylvania classrooms. Chemistry teacher Robert Eschbach said the trial has resulted in teachers being less timid when it comes to evolution...

  • Whither "Intelligent Design" Creationism? Lerner, Lawrence S. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p18 

    The article discusses the historical and philosophical evolution of "intelligent design" creationism. It explores on various related concepts of creationism which have helped creationists to introduce the supernatural works into observable nature. It also talks about the biological concepts...

  • Scientists and Literalists. Born, Daniel // Common Review;Spring2006, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p4 

    This article comments on the debate between evolutionary theorists and creationists over the narrative of Genesis 1 and 2. It reports on a federal judge's ruling that prohibited the proponents of intelligent design in the Dover, Pennsylvania school district to present their viewpoint in biology...

  • How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

  • EDITORIAL.  // Australasian Science;Jul2007, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1 

    The author comments on the advocacy of Doctor John Ashton of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (RACI) of intelligent design (ID). Ashton received harsh criticism from the scientific community due to his support of ID. Tas Wager of the of Creation of Ministries International accuses...

  • Clarifying Creationism: Five Common Myths. Numbers, Ronald L. // History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p129 

    The essay seeks to explain creationism and subvert five myths the author has identified concerning the subject and creationists. He first denies that creationists believe in the fixity of species and the perfect design of the world. He distinguishes between young-earth creationists and...

  • The Evolutionary Origins of Genetic Information. Freeland, Stephen // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Dec2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p240 

    Any living branch of science achieves progress by testing new ideas. The results of these tests determine whether each new idea is accepted as a change to what we thought we knew, is dismissed as incorrect, or simply stagnates, owing to a lack of clear evidence. For evolutionary theory, one such...

  • Intelligent Design: A Response. Hadley, Martin // Australasian Science;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p46 

    Comments on a Christian lobby group's arguments for the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to the teaching of evolution. Belief of the group regarding creation and the Book of Genesis; Criticisms against taking the text of Genesis literally; Advice on debating with a scientist...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics