TITLE

IF RACIAL DESEGREGATION, THEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE? ORIGINALISM AND THE SUPREME COURT'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

AUTHOR(S)
Bunch, Kenyon
PUB. DATE
June 2005
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2005, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p781
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Analyzes the concept of racial desegregation and its implications for the constitutionality of the nullification of the legalization of same-sex marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Originalist definition of civil rights and privileges or immunities clause based on analysis by scholars Michael Perry and Michael McConnell; Rights protected from racially discriminatory public policies under the 1866 Civil Rights Act; Public policy barriers to same-sex marriage and its impact on the federal system.
ACCESSION #
17755353

 

Related Articles

  • Dennis Kucinich. Kuhr, Fred // Advocate;2/3/2004, Issue 907, p33 

    This article presents an interview with U.S. presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, and information on his background and political views. Kucinich: States have the right to determine certain rules [regarding marriage]. But as our society has evolved, it has become very clear that the status of...

  • California couple's suit seeks end to same-sex marriage bans.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;2/3/2005, Issue 893, p27 

    Reports that a gay couple in Santa Ana, California has demanded the federal judge to overturn state and federal laws against same-sex marriage and arguing the violation of their civil rights which are equivalent to racial segregation. Permission of the state to disregard same-sex marriages...

  • Canada: The Constitution and same-sex marriage. Hogg, Peter W. // International Journal of Constitutional Law;Oct2006, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p712 

    Equality rights for same-sex couples—Reference Re Same-Sex Marriage—Civil Marriage Act expanding definition of marriage to include same-sex couples

  • Catfish Club takes on marriage equality debate. Bone, Travis D. // Gay & Lesbian Times;3/18/2004, Issue 847, p14 

    Focuses on the debate concerning the marriage equality for gay couples in the U.S. Views of the community leaders on same-sex marriage and civil rights; Outcome of the convention of the African-American community; Perspectives of the constitutional law on the issue.

  • New York's top court rules same-sex marriage not allowed in state.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;7/13/2006, Issue 968, p30 

    The article reports that New York's Court of Appeals has ruled on July 6, 2006 that same-sex marriage is not permitted under state law, rejecting arguments by same-sex couples who said the law violates their constitutional rights. In a 4-2 decision, the Court of Appeals ruled that the state's...

  • An Ecological Examination of North Carolina's Amendment One Vote to Ban Same Sex Marriage.  // Sociation Today;Spring/Summer2013, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p7 

    The article discusses the impact of the overwhelming passing of the constitutional amendment called Amendment One Vote to Ban Same Sex Marriage in North Carolina. The state voters have unanimously passed an amendment that constitutionalized the definition of marriage as exclusive between a man...

  • REFLEXIONES CONSTITUCIONALES A PROPÓSITO DEL LLAMADO "MATRIMONIO HOMOSEXUAL.". Nuevo, Pablo // Díkaion;2006, Vol. 20 Issue 15, p31 

    Through the enactment of the 13/2005 Civil Code Modification Act, regarding the Right to marry, same-sex marriages have become legal in Spain. This Act, proposed by the Government of the Prime Minister Mr. Rodríguez-Zapatero, was challenged by the Royal Academy for Jurisprudence and...

  • ACLU endorses marriage.  // Body Politic;Jan87, Issue 134, p19 

    Reports on the endorsement of lesbian and gay marriage by the civil rights organization American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Decision of the ACLU national board to adopt a policy statement calling for legal recognition of same-sex relationships; Contribution of ACLU to gay rights advocacy.

  • When Evidentiary Rules Enforce Substantive Policies: Same-Sex Marital Privilege Under Federal Rule of Evidence 501 in Diversity Cases. Bergstresser, John // New England Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p303 

    The article focuses on same-sex marital privilege under the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence in diversity cases. Information is provided on the U.S. court case Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, which dealt with the substantive right of marital privilege when being compelled to testify. Topics include...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics