TITLE

WHILE WE'RE AT IT

AUTHOR(S)
Neuhaus, Richard John
PUB. DATE
December 1996
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Dec1996, Issue 68, p62
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents information on the understandings of democracy of Kevin M. Cathcart, executive director of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, published in "The New York Times" newspaper in 1996. Use of courts and the constitution in expanding and protecting the rights of gays and lesbians by the Lambda; Interpretation of Cathcart on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to struck down the anti-gay amendment 2 in Colorado; Success of gay people in the courts than in the U.S. Congress concerning homosexuality.
ACCESSION #
17753816

 

Related Articles

  • Anti-Supreme Court Measures Now Pending in Congress.  // Congressional Digest;Dec35, Vol. 14 Issue 12, p301 

    Examines measures in Congress aimed at curbing the powers of the Supreme Court of the United States. Resolutions calling for constitutional amendments; Constitutionality of Acts of Congress; Legislative enactment.

  • Is A Constitutional Amendment To Provide For Cases Of President Disability Needed? PRO. Fulbright, J. W. // Congressional Digest;Jan1958, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p12 

    The article presents the views of the author, who is U.S. senator, Arkansas, Democrat, on whether a joint resolution proposing a Constitutional amendment relating to Presidential inability is needed or not. The proposed amendment provides that whenever the U.S. Congress believes the President is...

  • Is A Constitutional Amendment To Provide For Cases Of President Disability Needed? PRO. Peltason, Jack W. // Congressional Digest;Jan1958, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p28 

    The article presents the views of the author, who is a professor at the University of Illinois, on whether a joint resolution proposing a Constitutional amendment relating to Presidential inability is needed or not. The two most obvious agencies to make this decision are U.S. Congress and the...

  • Is A Constitutional Amendment To Provide For Cases Of President Disability Needed? CON. Fellman, David // Congressional Digest;Jan1958, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p25 

    The article presents the views of the author, who is a Professor at the University of Wisconsin, on whether a joint resolution proposing a Constitutional amendment relating to Presidential inability is needed or not. The U.S. Supreme Court could be authorized to investigate, appointing whatever...

  • THE CASE FOR THE SELECTIVE DISINCORPORATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: IS EVERSON A SUPER-PRECEDENT? Hilton, Russell A. // Emory Law Journal;2007, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p1701 

    The article focuses on the First Amendment Establishment Clause which penned the words Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion in the U.S. Throughout the subsequent 17th century and a half, the Supreme Court applied a two-tiered standard to religious free exercise and...

  • Religion in Congress and the Courts: Issues of Institutional Competence. Bevier, Lillian R. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall98, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p59 

    Examines the tension between the United States Congress and the Supreme Court over the constitutional issues surrounding the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). Impact of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment; Argument among the defenders of RFRA.

  • Lower Court Holding.  // Supreme Court Debates;Mar1999, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p70 

    The article discusses the legislative history of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 which is related to sexual harassments in schools. The Supreme Court has allowed private plaintiffs to proceed under Title IX only in cases that allege intentional gender discrimination by the...

  • THE SUPREME COURT BILL.  // America;7/17/1937, Vol. 57 Issue 15, p349 

    The author reflects on the plan of the U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt to reorganize the Supreme Court. He refers to the issue that rose in the plan that no president shall be authorized by Congress to impair the constitutional independence of the Supreme Court. He argues that the plan will...

  • NINE JUSTICES.  // America;3/13/1937, Vol. 56 Issue 23, p541 

    The article discusses the Amendments to stabilize the number of Justices of the Supreme Court. It states that the constitution does not fix the number of the Supreme Court. It notes that it is not known to authorize the Congress to fix the number of justices. Chief Justice Charles A. Goss, of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics