TITLE

Kingdoms in Conflict

AUTHOR(S)
Colson, Charles W.
PUB. DATE
November 1996
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov1996, Issue 67, p34
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on a systematic usurpation of political power by the U.S. judiciary that compels evangelical Christians to be inquisitive about moral legitimacy of political order in the country. Decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on a case regarding the prohibition of local civil rights statutes based on sexual orientation in Colorado; Factors to consider in assessing the relation of church and state; Views of philosopher Thomas Aquinas on the relation.
ACCESSION #
17753036

 

Related Articles

  • Court Will Review Teacher's Right to Damages in Free-Speech Case. James Hertling // Education Week;10/30/1985, Vol. 5 Issue 9, p11 

    The article reports on the agreement of the U.S. Supreme Court to review the validity of a 321,000 dollars jury award to a Michigan biology teacher due to suspension on the objection of the parents to his course on human reproduction. The case is based on the Memphis Community Schools versus...

  • CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT REJECT RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION TO GAY RIGHTS LAW. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2008, p155 

    The article discusses a court case involving the North Coast Women's Care Medical Group Inc. and Guadalupe T. Benitez. The civil rights claim was initiated by Benitez when the clinic denied her of fertility treatments due to the religious objections of the physicians. She asserts the exemption...

  • Hit the Wall and Keep Going.  // Christianity Today;07/10/2000, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p31 

    Editorial. Encourages Christians to continue fighting for their faith. Information on United States Supreme Court cases related to Christians claiming for homosexual discrimination and abortion; Information on the history of the church to which politics interfered.

  • THE EXTENSION OF DISPARATE IMPACT THEORY TO WHITE MEN: WHAT THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1991 PLAINLY DOES NOT MEAN. Didech, Kate L. // Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights;Winter2004, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p55 

    The article argues that disparate impact theory should not extend to white men in the United States. Part I discusses the history of the birth of disparate impact theory made possible by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Part II chronicles the Supreme Court's dismantling of disparate impact theory...

  • From the Editor. Miller, Ronald // Labor Law Journal;Summer2001, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p74 

    Focuses on the decisions made by courts affecting fundamental rights of the citizens in the U.S. Details of the U.S. Supreme Court case Bartnicki v. Vopper; Conflict between the First Amendment rights of radio stations to disseminate information on an issue of public concern and the privacy...

  • CRAWFORD'S SHORT-LIVED REVOLUTION: HOW DAVIS V. WASHINGTON REINS IN CRAWFORD'S REACH. Ross, Josephine // North Dakota Law Review;2007, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p387 

    The author reflects on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Washington that narrowed the scope of the Confrontation Clause jurisprudence. The issue was taken up again in Davis v. Washington. Using this subset of decisions, the author examined how lower courts implement Supreme Court...

  • LAWRENCE V TEXAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE. Rosenbaum, Sara; Burke, Taylor // Public Health Reports;Nov/Dec2003, Vol. 118 Issue 6, p559 

    Examines the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case of Lawrence versus Texas, which struck down the anti-sodomy statutes of Texas as in violation of the Constitutional right to individual liberty. Facts being disputed in the case; Implications of the case for public health policy and...

  • "WRITING THEIR FAITH INTO THE LAWS OF THE LAND:" JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND THE SUPREME COURT'S BATTLE FOR THE MEANING OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE, 1939-1945. Flynn, Patrick J. // Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights;Winter2004, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p1 

    The United States Supreme Court upheld the free exercise rights of the religious group Jehovah's Witnesses to conduct door-to-door without first obtaining a permit. The group asserted that their right to practice their faith through door-to-door contacts overrode the government's interest in...

  • Supreme Court Update.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the three employment-related decisions issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in February 2006. The decisions affect the manner in which small employers contest the applicability of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. They also affected the substantive legal...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics