TITLE

A Crisis of Legitimacy

AUTHOR(S)
Hittinger, Russell
PUB. DATE
November 1996
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov1996, Issue 67, p25
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court. Connection of abortion with the legitimacy of the court in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey Supreme Court case; Obedience of elected representative of the U.S. government to the Court's understanding of the constitutional order; Views on the new constitutional regime as of 1996.
ACCESSION #
17753025

 

Related Articles

  • When the Court Should Not Be Obeyed. Hittinger, Russell // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct1993, Issue 36, p12 

    Analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania versus Casey concerning abortion. Views of Republican government officials on the case; Implications of the case for conservatives in the area of electoral politics; Significance of the decision of the court to the...

  • TEXT, PRECEDENT, AND THE CONSTITUTION: SOME ORIGINALIST AND NORMATIVE ARGUMENTS FOR OVERRULING PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. CASEY. Calabresi, Steven G. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2005, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p311 

    The article argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should follow the text of the Constitution, as originally understood, rather than its own precedents, where there is clear conflict between the two. The claim is defended using originalist and normative arguments. The approach is applied to the U.S....

  • The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Jurisprudence of Class. Mariner, Wendy K. // American Journal of Public Health;Nov92, Vol. 82 Issue 11, p1556 

    The US Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey both protects a woman's liberty to choose to terminate her pregnancy and permits the state to make it more difficult for her to exercise her choice. In their opinion on the case, Justices O'Connor,...

  • Planned Parenthood vs. Casey (1992).  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents the United States Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania vs. Robert Casey, the Governor of Pennsylvania which was decided in June 1992. How five provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 were examined; Citing of the Roe v. Wade case;...

  • The Constitution of Babel. Smith, Steven D. // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Jan1998, Issue 79, p27 

    Compares the constitutional decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court to the biblical legend of Tower of Babel. Overview of the biblical legend; Central role of pride in constitutional law; Manifestation of pride in the decision in the Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern...

  • UNDUE BURDEN AND THE LAW OF ABORTION IN ARIZONA. Roseberry, Jeffrey // Arizona State Law Journal;Spring2012, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p391 

    The article offers information on the significance of the undue burden standard and the abortion law in implementing constitutional restrictions to abortion in Arizona. It discusses several cases of the U.S. Supreme Court including Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania...

  • Justices Hear Arguments In Pa. Abortion-Law Case. M. W. // Education Week;4/29/1992, Vol. 11 Issue 32, p21 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments challenging the law placing restrictions on abortion including the requirement that minors obtain the informed consent of one parent or a judge's permission before engaging in abortion in the case “Planned Parenthood of...

  • The Legal Status of Abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is Overruled. Linton, Paul Benjamin // Issues in Law & Medicine;Spring2012, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p181 

    This article explores the legal status of abortion in the States if the Supreme Court overrules Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973), as modified by Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Although an overruling decision eventually could have a...

  • PROTECTING THE ONE PERCENT: RELEVANT WOMEN, UNDUE BURDENS, AND UNWORKABLE JUDICIAL BYPASSES. Rex, Alexandra // Columbia Law Review;Jan2014, Vol. 114 Issue 1, p85 

    The purpose of this Note is to analyze one widely enacted category of abortion regulations--parental involvement laws--and the effect of such regulations on their targeted group--pregnant minors. According to the Supreme Court, abortion regulations are constitutional only if they satisfy the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics