Utilitarian vs. Humanitarian: The Battle Over the Law of War

Krauss, Eric S.; Lacey, Mike O.
June 2002
Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Summer2002, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p73
Academic Journal
Discusses the conflict between utilitarian and humanitarian in the battle over the law of war. Development of the law of war driven by two radically different perspectives; History of combat the rule regulating the conduct of warriors on the battlefield; Existence of the international law.


Related Articles

  • The Eritrea/Ethiopia Claims Commission Oversteps Its Boundaries: A Partial Award? Gray, Christine // European Journal of International Law;Sep2006, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p669 

    The recent decision by the Eritrea/ Ethiopia Claims Commission on the ius ad bellum claims of Ethiopia -- that Eritrea had violated the law on the use of force in starting the 1998-2000 war between the two states -- is a troubling one. It raises questions about the proper role of arbitral...

  • Crimes of War and the Force of Law. Hagan, John; Levi, Ron // Social Forces;Jun2005, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p1499 

    The origin and enforcement of criminal law are central to the sociological study of crime, yet we know relatively little about how the coercive apparatus of criminalization is actualized through prosecutorial and court practices. We use Bourdieu's extension of Weber's analysis of law to develop...

  • Just War Theory and the War on Terrorism. Whitman, Jeffrey P. // Public Integrity;Winter2006/2007, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p23 

    Most Americans see the attacks of 9/11 as an unprecedented act of terrorism. Issues related to the response to these attacks have convinced many observers that the current international law regime is an outmoded relic. In particular, they say, the tradition of a just war, which provides the...

  • On Some Merits of the Israeli Judgment on Targeted Killings. Cassese, Antonio // Journal of International Criminal Justice;May2007, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p339 

    The recent judgment by the Israeli Supreme Court on targeted killings is a landmark decision in many respects. Its main merit lies in trying to give precision to, and therefore make concretely applicable by the belligerents, some loose standards of international humanitarian law on the conduct...

  • Rethinking Guant�namo. Stewart, James G. // Journal of International Criminal Justice;Mar2006, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p12 

    Although criticism of US-led detention at Guant�namo Bay has been extensive, little attention has been placed on evaluating the implications of international humanitarian law standards as applied in international criminal law. This paper concludes that there is a striking resemblance...

  • The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities. Fenrick, William J. // Journal of International Criminal Justice;May2007, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p332 

    The Judgment is the first in depth analysis of the notion of direct participation in hostilities in International Humanitarian Law. This notion encompasses the direct participation by civilians in hostilities in a broad variety of circumstances, ranging from full-time membership and...

  • WAR EVERYWHERE: RIGHTS, NATIONAL SECURITY LAW, AND THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT IN THE AGE OF TERROR. Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Dec2004, Vol. 153 Issue 2, p675 

    Focuses on the law of war and international humanitarian law in the U.S. Background on the evolution and content of the law of armed conflict and the international system it presupposes; Examination on the concrete ways in which the boundaries between traditional categories have eroded, looking...

  • ERRATA.  // Stanford Journal of International Law;Winter98, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p218 

    Several corrections to the article "Belligerents in Blue Helmets: Applying International Humanitarian Law to United Nations Peace Operations," by Brian D. Tittemore are presented.

  • The regulation of non-international armed conflicts: Can a privilege of belligerency be envisioned in the law of non-international armed conflicts? Kreβ, Claus; Mégret, Frédéric // International Review of the Red Cross;Mar2014, Vol. 96 Issue 893, p29 

    The Debate section of the Review aims to contribute to reflection on contemporary questions of humanitarian law, policy or action. In this issue of the Review, we invited two experts in international humanitarian law (IHL) – Claus Kreβ and Frédéric Mégret – to debate on...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics