Why We Need Interreligious Polemics

Griffiths, Paul J.
June 1994
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Jun/Jul1994, Issue 44, p31
Focuses on interreligious polemics. Definition of apologetics; Benefits of interreligious polemics; Historical reasons for interreligious dialogue between Christians and Jews.


Related Articles

  • Counter-History and Jewish Polemics Against Christianity: The Sefer toldot yeshu and the Sefer zerubavel. Biale, David // Jewish Social Studies;Fall99, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p130 

    This article focuses on the polemics between Jews and Christians in the work of Jewish philosopher Amos Funkenstein. Funkenstein devoted a significant amount of his scholarly attention to polemics between Jews and Christians. He was particularly interested in how each religion borrowed motifs...

  • The Future of Theological Ethics. Geuss, Raymond // Studies in Christian Ethics;May2012, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p160 

    The traditional discipline of apologetics contained an important insight about the necessity for Christians to address non-Christians about their practices and beliefs; however, in the modern world apologetics needs to be refocused to include not just non-Christians who have specific theoretical...

  • CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS AS LEGITIMATION. Bates, Vernon L. // Humboldt Journal of Social Relations;1981, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p80 

    The article discusses the problem of legitimation. The problem of legitimation has been a significant concern for American theologians and laypersons due to the secularizing forces of scientific and biblical scholarship. Christian theology is verified through Christian apologetics and a part of...

  • In Defence of Life. Andiñach, Pablo R. // Studies in World Christianity;2002, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p285 

    The article considers the significance of human life, viewed behind the ideologies of the Christian faith. Issues raised against the realities of life are presented. The author also looks at the effects of spiritual problems on the faith held by human beings; Flaws seen on the faith of most...

  • BEAUTY AS AN INCARNATIONAL APOLOGETIC IN A POST-RATIONAL SOCIETY. Armitage, Sten-Erik // Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN): Theses & Dissertat;2012, preceding p1 

    Apologetics today act under the premise that society and popular thought are still ruled and influenced by a modernist view of truth and rationality. In reality, that premise is now fundamentally flawed. Society is in a state of flux. The epistemic paradigm is changing from one of certainty to...

  • FROM CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS TO ENLIGHTENED DEISM: THE CASE OF JACQUES ABBADIE (1656-1727). Whelan, Ruth // Modern Language Review;Jan1992, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p32 

    This article presents a criticism of the Jacques Abbadie's philosophy from Christian apologetics to Enlightened deism. Jacques Abbadie's reputation in 18th-century France is typical of the fate of all Christian apologists in that Enlightened age. Writers who did follow his lead are legion, and...

  • ROBERTS, Tom Aerwyn (1924-99). Brown, Stuart // Continuum Encyclopedia of British Philosophy;2006, Vol. 4, p2734 

    An encyclopedia entry for Tom Aerwyn Roberst is presented. He was born in Cleobury on July 31, 1924 and died in Wandsworth in 1999. It offers information on his education. He had an early interest in the philosophical basis of religious apologetics. In his "History and Christian Apologetic"...

  • The Aniconic Tradition, Deuteronomy 4, and the Politics of Israelite Identity. Feder, Yitzhaq // Journal of Biblical Literature;Summer2013, Vol. 132 Issue 2, p251 

    The present article examines the aniconic polemics of the Hebrew Bible in an attempt to appreciate better their role in defining Israelite cultural boundaries and belief. The first part of the article deals with early sources in the aniconic tradition on which Deuteronomy 4 builds, particularly...

  • Johnson on Van Til: A Rejoinder. Frame, John; Hays, Steve // Evangelical Quarterly;Jul2004, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p227 

    Comments on John Johnson's article about the apologetics of Cornelius Van Til. Consideration of the Van Tilian apologetics as a generic theism; Fault on the contention of Van Til that the presuppositional method robs the Christian apologist of appeal to the Resurrection; Limits to the knowledge...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics