TITLE

When the Court Should Not Be Obeyed

AUTHOR(S)
Hittinger, Russell
PUB. DATE
October 1993
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct1993, Issue 36, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania versus Casey concerning abortion. Views of Republican government officials on the case; Implications of the case for conservatives in the area of electoral politics; Significance of the decision of the court to the abortion issue.
ACCESSION #
17728275

 

Related Articles

  • The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Jurisprudence of Class. Mariner, Wendy K. // American Journal of Public Health;Nov92, Vol. 82 Issue 11, p1556 

    The US Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey both protects a woman's liberty to choose to terminate her pregnancy and permits the state to make it more difficult for her to exercise her choice. In their opinion on the case, Justices O'Connor,...

  • A Crisis of Legitimacy. Hittinger, Russell // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov1996, Issue 67, p25 

    Focuses on the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court. Connection of abortion with the legitimacy of the court in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey Supreme Court case; Obedience of elected representative of the U.S. government to the Court's understanding of the constitutional order; Views on the...

  • Planned Parenthood vs. Casey (1992).  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents the United States Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania vs. Robert Casey, the Governor of Pennsylvania which was decided in June 1992. How five provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 were examined; Citing of the Roe v. Wade case;...

  • Justices Hear Arguments In Pa. Abortion-Law Case. M. W. // Education Week;4/29/1992, Vol. 11 Issue 32, p21 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments challenging the law placing restrictions on abortion including the requirement that minors obtain the informed consent of one parent or a judge's permission before engaging in abortion in the case “Planned Parenthood of...

  • TWENTY-WEEK BANS, NEW MEDICAL EVIDENCE, AND THE EFFECT ON CURRENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ABORTION LAW PRECEDENT. Line, Shea Leigh // Idaho Law Review;2014, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p139 

    The article offers information on the history, development and significance of the abortion law in context of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in three cases including Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Roe v. Wade and Gonzales v. Carhart. It informs that various states of the U.S. enacted...

  • GONZALES, CASEY, AND THE VIABILITY RULE. Beck, Randy // Northwestern University Law Review;Winter2009, Vol. 103 Issue 1, p249 

    This essay argues that the U.S. Supreme Court has an unreel obligation to account for the significance accorded to fetal viability in its abortion jurisprudence. It offers three reasons to believe the court has an obligation to either justify the viability rule or abandon it. It examines the...

  • Revisiting Roe. Rienzi, Mark // Priest;Jan2012, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p10 

    The article assesses the legal analysis used by the U.S. Supreme Court in the declaration of a constitutional right to abortion in the case Roe v. Wade. The role of the contraceptive right case of Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965 in Roe v. Wade is discussed. The plurality opinion in Planned...

  • LEGAL DOES NOT MEAN RATIONAL: THE PRACTICALITY OF TREATING FIRST-TRIMESTER ABORTION CLINICS THE SAME AS HOSPITALS. Wlodek, Ania O. // William & Mary Journal of Women & the Law;Winter2012, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p395 

    The article explores the practical effects of operating the first-trimester abortion clinics under the legal regulations of the Virginia law. It depicts lack of availability of abortion clinics and increased abortion cost in Virginia. It discusses the U.S. Supreme court case of Planned...

  • UNDUE BURDEN AND THE LAW OF ABORTION IN ARIZONA. Roseberry, Jeffrey // Arizona State Law Journal;Spring2012, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p391 

    The article offers information on the significance of the undue burden standard and the abortion law in implementing constitutional restrictions to abortion in Arizona. It discusses several cases of the U.S. Supreme Court including Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics