Neuhaus, Richard John
December 1990
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Dec1990, Issue 8, p65
Focuses on the decision of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in Hodgson v. Minnesota, that the Court is fundamentally wrong in trying to devise an abortion code to be applied to all the states. Various opinions of justices on the requirement for parents to be notified when a minor seeks an abortion, but providing for court permission when there are compelling reasons for the parents not to be notified.


Related Articles

  • Justice Rip Van Winkle. Quindlen, Anna // Newsweek;7/14/2003, Vol. 142 Issue 2, p68 

    Discusses how the majority of justices in the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the private sexual conduct between consenting adults is not the business of the government. How the court outlawed the state sodomy laws that criminalized homosexual acts; Consideration of the dissent of justice...

  • WHAT IF THE UNIVERSAL INJURY-IN-FACT TEST ALREADY Is NORMATIVE? Siegel, Jonathan R. // Alabama Law Review;2013, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p403 

    William Fletcher's The Structure of Standing criticized current law for purporting to make a plaintiff's standing to sue turn on a universal, non-normative, "factual" inquiry. However, at least one prominent proponent of standing doctrine, Justice Scalia, asserts a normative theory that claims...

  • Ten Years from Now... Shafer, Gregory // Humanist;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p39 

    Predicts the situation of gays in the U.S. in 2013. Ruling in the Lawrence versus Texas case; Message from Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia about the Texas' sodomy law; Details on the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah; Myths about gay parents.

  • IN NINO VERITAS. Sager, R. H. // American Spectator;Aug/Sep2003, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p20 

    Focuses on the decision of Justice Antonin Scalia in the Lawrence versus Texas sodomy case. Information on an article in the "Washington Post" concerning the decision of Scalia in the case; Accusations of Scalia against his colleagues; Views on his dissent in the case.

  • Hodgson v. Minnesota.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Hodgson v. Minnesota argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by the judges.

  • Scalia comments on public religious expression to paper.  // Buffalo Law Journal;9/21/2009, Vol. 81 Issue 76, p4 

    The article focuses on the defense of Honorable Antonin Scalia on the recent court ruling concerning the accommodation of religion in public sphere. Scalia asserts that exclusion of religion was never a constitutional, social, or even legal tradition in the U.S. She justifies her claim by citing...

  • Illiberal Court. Forte, David // National Review;7/29/1996, Vol. 48 Issue 14, p40 

    The article charges that the U.S. Supreme Court is engaged in the process of undermining democracy under Justice Antonin Scalia. Scalia uses his acerbic style to destroy the logic of Supreme Court opinions. His disparagement of the views held by his colleagues has sometimes almost turned into...

  • Exposing the soft jurisprudential underbelly of Roe v. Wade. Andrusko, Dave // National Right to Life News;Dec2016, p13 

    The article examines the interview that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia gave to television personality Piers Morgan about the issue of abortion in the U.S. Topics mentioned include the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court abortion case Roe v. Wade, Morgan's effort to shame Scalia into agreeing that...

  • Too much talk.  // ABA Journal;Jul93, Vol. 79 Issue 7, p43 

    Quotes Justice Antonin Scalia on questioning of U.S. Supreme Court nominees at the last few confirmation hearings. As quoted by the Associated Press.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics