TITLE

COUNTERING EXTREMISM

AUTHOR(S)
Neuhaus, Richard John
PUB. DATE
October 1991
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct1991, Issue 16, p64
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the contribution of extremist Planned Parenthood (PP) to civil discourse about Rust versus Sullivan, a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declined to declare unconstitutional a rule that prevents government-funded clinics from promoting abortion. Annual income of PP for performing abortions; Demand of PP to impose the abortionists' moral judgments on the U.S. people; Judge who dissented in the case and stated that the case endorses censorship of what anyone says on any job supported by government funds so as that restriction is limited to the funded workplace.
ACCESSION #
17727336

 

Related Articles

  • What will be the impact of Rust v. Sullivan? Sending a Message. Presser, Stephen; Presser, ArLynn Leiber // ABA Journal;Aug91, Vol. 77 Issue 8, p32 

    Argues in favor of the court decision on the case, Rust v. Sullivan which limits the right of federally funded clinics in the United States to engage in abortion counseling. Controversy over the U.S. government's choice of allocation of expenditures; Impact of the decision on indigent women who...

  • A New Threat to Nonprofits. Rosenman, Mark // Social Policy;Summer91, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p2 

    This article examines the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Rust versus Sullivan case. On May 23, 1991, the Supreme Court handed down a decision that allows the federal government to ban the staff of any independent organizations receiving funds under the Public Health...

  • RUST v. SULLIVAN. Quindlen, Anna // Columbia Journalism Review;Nov/Dec1991, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p52 

    The article presents the author's views on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Rust v. Sullivan in 1991 concerning U.S. government regulations that prohibited federally funded family planning clinics to discuss abortion with patients. The author relates how doctor Irving Rust was...

  • THE SPREAD OF RUST. Fitzpatrick, James F. // Columbia Journalism Review;Nov/Dec1991, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p53 

    The article focuses on the implications of the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Rust v. Sullivan in 1991 concerning U.S. government regulations that prohibited federally funded family planning clinics to discuss abortion with patients. People from various communities, including...

  • Gagging our rights. Ifill, S.A. // Essence (Essence);Jan1992, Vol. 22 Issue 9, p98 

    Opinion. Denounces the US Supreme Court decision in `Rust vs. Sullivan.' How it upheld regulations that prohibit any health facility receiving federal funds under Title X of the Public Health Service Act from mentioning abortion to pregnant patients; Negative impact on poor women of color;...

  • Gag rulers. Eastland, T. // American Spectator;Sep91, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p27 

    Comments on press coverage of the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of `Rust v. Sullivan,' which prohibits federally-funded family-planning clinics from telling their clients about abortion. Misunderstandings the presses contributed to; Coverage by `USA Today' and `Time' magazine;...

  • Rust v. Sullivan.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Rust v. Sullivan argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by judges.

  • Kagan Wants to Impose Her Values on Your Speech. Jeffrey, Terence P. // Human Events;5/24/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 19, p10 

    The article discusses U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's practice of the freedom of speech. The author says she has written articles in two law journals that attack the decision of the Supreme Court in Rust v. Sullivan, suggesting the court's decision was an illegitimate act of "viewpoint...

  • FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF TEACHERS' INSTRUCTIONAL SPEECH: EXTENDING RUST V. SULLIVAN TO ENSURE THAT TEACHERS DO NOT DISTORT THE GOVERNMENT MESSAGE. KIRSCH, EMILY WHITE // Cleveland State Law Review;2010, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p185 

    The article discusses the concerns related to the U.S. first amendment regarding protection of teachers' instructional class speech. It mentions the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and the No Child Left Behind Act in order to determine the federal government's role and spending in public...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics