TITLE

Abortion and the Neutral State

AUTHOR(S)
Hunt, Robert P.
PUB. DATE
October 1990
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct1990, Issue 6, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on the argument presented by author John Arthur, that Federalists, in writing the U.S. Constitution were actually defending the neural state. Views on Arthur's interpretation that the Federalists' design which assumed society is composed of diverse, pluralistic factions; Remarks on Arthur's idea that only those human beings that display certain mental characteristics are endowed with the right to life; Intellectual decline of contemporary liberalism observed in Arthur's thought.
ACCESSION #
17726313

 

Related Articles

  • Politics and the Supreme Court.  // America;10/12/1968, Vol. 119 Issue 11, p311 

    The article focuses on the controversy between the Supreme Court and politics in the U.S. It mentions that the power of the Constitution separates the Supreme Court from the President and Congress. It notes that the Supreme Court is a judicial body which is above politics and operates in total...

  • The Duty to Criminalize*. Harel, Alon // Law & Philosophy;Jan2015, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p1 

    The state has a duty to protect individuals from violations of their basic rights to life and liberty. But does the state have a duty to criminalize such violations? Further, if there is a duty on the part of the state to criminalize violations, should the duty be constitutionally entrenched?...

  • Liberality. Hamburger, Philip // Texas Law Review;May2000, Vol. 78 Issue 6, p1215 

    Discusses the concept of liberality in the United States. Origins and non-theoretical character of liberality; Its association with the law; Overview on the social context of liberality; Conclusion.

  • CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: DANGEROUS THREAT OR DEMOCRACY IN ACTION? Presser, Stephen B. // Texas Review of Law & Politics;Fall2000, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p209 

    Focuses on the process of constitutional amendments in the U.S. History of constitutional amendments; Intent of the framers; Theories regarding constitutional amendments; Analysis of the flag protection amendments.

  • The Constiution: a weapon of knowledge. cockerham, peggy // Clarendon Enterprise (TX);1/24/2013, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p4 

    The article discusses the form of governance that the U.S. has for its constituents wherein Americans live under a Constitutional Republic form of government in contrast to what other have thought wherein the majority would think it is democratic.

  • Right to Life as Basic Structure of Indian Constitution. Ullah, Aman; Uzair, Samee // South Asian Studies (1026-678X);Jul2011, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p393 

    Right to life in the British India was not guaranteed as a constitutional right. However, its demand was tremendous. After Independence, it was incorporated in the Constitution under Article 21. However, it was not an absolute fundamental right, but could be taken away by an ordinary...

  • Basic Structure of Constitution: Impact of Kesavananda Bharati on Constitutional Status of Fundamental Rights. Ullah, Aman; Uzair, Samee // South Asian Studies (1026-678X);Jul2011, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p299 

    Kesavananda Bharati was a mile stone in the constitutional history of India after Golak Nath. In Golak Nath, the Indian parliament was incapacitated to amend any fundamental right, guaranteed in the Constitution, while in Kesavananda case, the amendment power of Parliament was recognized, but...

  • From Liberty to Welfare: An Update. Sterba, James P. // Social Theory & Practice;Fall2000, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p465 

    The article presents the author's views on the relationship between the concepts of liberty and right to welfare. The author differentiates between two types of libertarianism namely Spencerian libertarianism and Lockean libertarianism. For Spencerian libertarians, right to liberty is basic as...

  • Right to Life and Personal Liberty: A Judicial Analysis. Ranganath, V. G. // IUP Law Review;Apr2013, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p44 

    Deprivation of liberty must be considered as a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that an accused will stand his trial when called upon. The courts owe more than verbal respect to the principle that punishment begins after conviction, and that every man is deemed to be innocent until...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics