TITLE

Reification of Psychiatric Diagnoses as Defamatory: Implications for Ethical Clinical Practice

AUTHOR(S)
Grover, Sonja
PUB. DATE
March 2005
SOURCE
Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry;Spring2005, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p77
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
While the mental health professional generally has beneficent motives and an honest belief in the DSM diagnoses assigned to clients, such diagnoses may yet be defamatory when communicated to third parties. Mental health diagnoses invariably lower the individual's reputation in the eyes of the community. At the same time, DSM diagnoses are but one out of a myriad of possible interpretive frameworks. DSM descriptors for the client's distress thus cannot be said to capture the essence of the client's personhood. When a diagnosis is published as if it captured a definitive truth about an individual psychiatric client, it is, in that important regard, inaccurate. That is, such a communication meets the criterion for a reckless disregard for the truth or an honest belief but without reasonable basis insofar as it is considered to be anything more than a working hypothesis. Hence, in certain cases, DSM labeling may constitute defamation.
ACCESSION #
17673055

 

Related Articles

  • Medical confidentiality and infectious diseases. Wilson, Beth // Legaldate;Aug2003, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p4 

    Focuses on medical confidentiality and its applicability in cases of infectious diseases. Definition of medical confidentiality; Importance of medical confidentiality; Discussion on ethical and legal dilemmas involving medical confidentiality through the presentation of a patient's infectious...

  • Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register. Haynes, Charlotte L.; Cook, Gary A.; Jones, Michael A. // Journal of Medical Ethics;May2007, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p302 

    The legal requirements and justifications for collecting patient-identifiable data without patient consent were examined. The impetus for this arose from legal and ethical issues raised during the development of a population-based disease register. Numerous commentaries and case studies have...

  • Threats to confidentiality. Reynolds, Mildred M. // Social Work;Mar76, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p108 

    The article focuses on some of the circumstances in which questions and problems have arisen about confidential information in medical care in the U.S. Patients and clients of health care providers are frequently told that what they say will be kept: confidential and that the information...

  • Avoid violating privacy regs, claims of negligence for patients with STDs.  // ED Legal Letter;Mar2007, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p29 

    The article reminds doctors to avoid violating privacy regulations for patients with sexually transmitted diseases (STD). The author says that a doctor may be accused of negligence, violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and risk criminal and civil liabilities. He...

  • Talking privacy.  // New Zealand Doctor;4/8/2009, p34 

    In this article the author offers insights on the dilemma of disclosing confidential information. In the case of a patient who is suspected of a crime and information about him is sought by the police, the Health Act of New Zealand allows police to request access to health information if there...

  • Physician Breach of Patient Confidentiality Among Individuals with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Patterns of Decision. Schwartzbaum, Judith A.; Wheat, John R.; Norton, Robert W. // American Journal of Public Health;Jul1990, Vol. 80 Issue 7, p829 

    To determine whether the sex, race, or sexual preference of a patient infected with immunodeficiency virus (HIV) influences a physician's decision to breach patient confidentiality, Tennessee primary care physicians were mailed a questionnaire containing a case study in which an HIV-infected...

  • Court says physicians should warn, but not necessarily testify.  // Contemporary OB/GYN;Feb2004, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p16 

    The article states that physicians should report when a patient could harm another or warn the intended target, but they should not testify in the patient's trial, according to the opinion of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California. It outlines the explanation of the federal...

  • The physician's authority to withhold futile treatment. Griener, Glenn G. // Journal of Medicine & Philosophy;Apr95, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p207 

    Contends that the scientific data which would support a physician's unilateral decision to withhold futile treatment also provide support for an institutional policy restricting access to the treatment. Different senses of futility; Justifiability of the surrender of the patient's decision...

  • Between ourselves. Kennedy, Ian // Journal of Medical Ethics;Jun94, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p100 

    Editorial. Discusses the issue of confidentiality between physician and patient. Medical ethics' recognition of circumstances in which the doctor may have a countervailing duty to disclose what has been learned in confidence; Threat posed to confidentiality by information technology and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics