TITLE

Spring Law sinks Tracy Edwards' defence

AUTHOR(S)
Harris, Joanne
PUB. DATE
July 2005
SOURCE
Lawyer;7/11/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 27, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the success of niche litigation practice Spring Law against Denton Wilde Sapte in a high court case brought against yachtswoman Tracy Edwards in Denton, England. Fight of sponsorship and marketing manager Mark Wilson to recoup interest from the loan, his salary and expenses incurred during his working time for Edwards; Total amount of award received by in relation to his claim and costs; Other details highlighted in the case.
ACCESSION #
17629983

 

Related Articles

  • Med-mal insurer sees claims fall. Strahler, Steven R. // Crain's Chicago Business;3/20/2006, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p2 

    The article reports that claim payments fell while profits and executive pay rose last year at ISMIE Mutual Insurance Co., the medical malpractice insurer that persuaded Illinois law-makers to cap non-economic damage awards in malpractice cases. Since 2003, annual claims payments have declined...

  • Proxy Season Shakedown: A New Wave of Suits Challenging Compensation Disclosures. Fukumura, Koji F.; Santamaria, Jessica Valenzuela; Adams, Peter // Securities Litigation Journal;Winter2013, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p19 

    The article discusses the kinds of lawsuit filed by shareholder plaintiffs against directors of companies who failed their say-on-pay votes. These suits alleged that the board's decision to adopt the proposed executive compensation plan was not a valid exercise of business judgment. The...

  • Subcontractor claim under main policy valid. Kobrin, David // Accountancy;Feb1984, Vol. 95 Issue 1086, p48 

    Reports on a case concerning insurance claim of a subcontractor in Great Britain. Background of the case; Court decision; Review of related law.

  • Motivating Integrity. Navas, Luis // Canadian Underwriter;May2005, Vol. 72 Issue 5, p50 

    Discusses issues regarding executive compensation. Legal cases related to executive compensation; Discussion of the issue of independence among compensation consultants; Suggestions for compensation audits.

  • No job, no pay.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);11/7/2008, Vol. 55 Issue 55, p22A 

    The article reports that the Washington Supreme Court has ruled that Verizon managers who lost their jobs were not entitled to unemployment compensation. The court points out that these managers voluntarily accepted the company's offer to participate in a reduction in force program. Under the...

  • Case notes.  // Accountancy;Jan2007, Vol. 139 Issue 1361, p126 

    The article provides a description of a lawsuit brought before the U.K.'s Court of Appeal in 2006. According to the report, the action deals with a suit filed regarding the non-payment of bonuses by a British branch of Commerzbank AG. The plaintiff was alleging breach of contract on the part of...

  • LITIGATION LESSONS FOR FINANCIAL EXECUTIVES. Hopkins, Sheryl // Financial Executive;Dec2013, Vol. 29 Issue 10, p18 

    The article presents lessons for financial executives about being sued as inferred from three actual cases involving a Ponzi scheme, executive compensation, and embezzlement. The author cites the importance of mounting an aggressive defense that examines the plaintiff's behavior, and the dangers...

  • The Perils of Ignoring a 'No' Vote on Executive Compensation. Lane, Roger A.; Worcester, Courtney // NACD Directorship;Jan/Feb2012, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p66 

    The article focuses on the derivative lawsuits filed against companies in relation to the negative stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation. The lawsuit alleges breach of the fiduciary duty of loyalty against the company's current directors. It also alleges that the negative vote...

  • Suing about say on pay.  // Pensions & Investments;4/1/2013, Vol. 41 Issue 7, p10 

    The author reflects on litigation by shareholders against their company demanding executive pay disclosure, called sue on pay. Topics include shareholders' lawsuits against computer companies Apple Inc. and Microsoft Corp. and Brocade Communications Systems Inc., why shareholders sue, and the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics