TITLE

Company Law Bill could see a sting in its tail for auditors

AUTHOR(S)
Baker, Carol
PUB. DATE
April 2005
SOURCE
Credit Control;2005, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the arguments of accountancy firms in Great Britain that the Company Law bill could land many innocent accountants in jail simply because they made a bad mistake, and are mounting campaign against plans to threaten them with jail. Provision of the Company Law Reform White Paper; Refusal of the investors to support the government's proposals; Appeal of environmentalists to persuade ministers to radically change the bill to increase corporate liability for social and environmental damage.
ACCESSION #
17602690

 

Related Articles

  • The Companies Act 1967?  // Accountancy;Dec1966, Vol. 77 Issue 880, p840 

    The article focuses on the proposed 1967 Companies Act in Great Britain. The bill proposed the abolition of the exempt private company. The abolition may bring to an end two concessions. Several clauses and provisions of the bill will largely affect the professional practice of accountants and...

  • INDEPENDENCE AND INCORPORATION.  // Accountancy;Nov88, Vol. 102 Issue 1143, p181 

    Presents the text of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales's consultative document regarding the British government's proposal to regulate auditors. Adoption and provisions of the European Commission's Eighth Company Law Directive; Limit on non-auditors' voting rights in...

  • New powers for auditors increase IT's compliance burden. Huber, Nick // Computer Weekly;4/26/2005, p20 

    The article reports that the amendments to the British Companies Act 2004 give auditors additional powers to obtain accounting information from companies. British companies will have to comply with requests for information relating to their accounts and may be subject to investigations by the...

  • SCOPE OF PRACTICE: INDEPENDENCE AND MDP. Colson, Robert H. // CPA Journal;Feb2001, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p80 

    Comments on the scope of multidisciplinary practice (MDP), auditor independence, and the state regulation of accounting practice in the United States. Principal concern regarding MDP; Information on how the accounting profession view independence; Reason for the consolidation among accounting...

  • Practising in the provinces. Robinson, Jane // Accountancy;Mar1975, Vol. 86 Issue 979, p92 

    Discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the practice of accounting in British provincial cities. Contrast with running an accounting firm in London, England; Mergers of accounting firms; Provincial firm's desire for an auditor close at hand.

  • Accountancy provisions remain substantially unchanged.  // Accountancy;Nov82, Vol. 93 Issue 1071, p7 

    Focuses on the European Union's proposed Fifth Directive company law as of November 1982. Provisions of the proposed regulation affecting accounting firms and staff.

  • Muted applause for liability win. Walters, Kath; Stensholt, John // BRW;9/26/2002, Vol. 24 Issue 38, p77 

    Focuses on the corporate law economic reform program for accounting firms in Australia. Replacement of joint-and-several liability with proportionate liability; Expansion of the Financial Reporting Council's role; Improvement of auditor independence and corporate disclosure.

  • THE WRONG DIRECTION. Nichols, John // BRW;11/07/2002, Vol. 24 Issue 44, p14 

    Comments on the article about the federal government's corporate law economic reform program in Australia, published in the periodical 'Business Review Weekly.' Fears expressed by the accounting firms in relation to the program; Qualifications for the independent directors to sit on audit...

  • Targeting the Everyday Taxpayer: Expanding the Scope of Contingent Fee Audits. Difrischia, Richard R. // Journal of State Taxation;Spring2000, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p112 

    Discusses the popularity and use of private auditing firms in pursuing delinquent taxpayers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Controversy over private auditors on their contingency fee contracts; Expansion of contingent fee audits; Expenditure of public funds.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics