TITLE

IF LEGISLATORS FAIL, WHO IS THERE TO FOLLOW?

AUTHOR(S)
Wesley, Richard C.
PUB. DATE
May 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p703
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Addresses the role of the U.S. Congress in the administration of justice in the U.S. Discussion on the ability of the legislators to manipulate legislation; Correlation of judicial function with judicial activism; Information on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Commission.
ACCESSION #
17510582

 

Related Articles

  • COMMON LAW CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE LIMITS OF REASON. Vermeule, Adrian // Columbia Law Review;Oct2007, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p1482 

    A central claim of common law constitutionalism has been that precedent and tradition embody some form of latent wisdom. On this view, judges will generally do best by deferring to the wisdom embodied in precedent and tradition, rather than trusting their unaided reason. This Essay offers a...

  • A Human Right to Water: Challenges and Opportunities for Ensuring this Right in Bangladesh. Islam, Mohammad Sohidul // Australian Journal of Asian Law;2014, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p1 

    A human right to water has been a major issue in recent times, both nationally and internationally. The international community has taken different approaches to tackle the global water crisis by realising a human right to water. Unfortunately, international uncertainty remains. Bangladesh...

  • ACTIVIST OR AUTOMATON: THE INSTITUTIONAL NEED TO REACH A MIDDLE GROUND IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE. Lavoie, Richard // Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p611 

    Discusses the importance of establishing a middle ground for the legislative and judicial institutions in order to establish and gain unbiased jurisprudence in the U.S. Significance of internal constraints on judicial behavior to the regulation of judicial activism; Impact of judicial activism...

  • A THEORY OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY AND THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE. Cooter, Robert D.; Gilbert, Michael D. // Columbia Law Review;Apr2010, Vol. 110 Issue 3, p687 

    Citizens in many states use direct democracy to make laws on everything from soda bottles and horse meat to affirmative action and same-sex marriage. Does direct democracy save citizens from corrupt legislators, or does it enfeeble competent representatives and empower an ignorant crowd? These...

  • Our Imperial Judiciary. Krauthammer, Charles // Time International (South Pacific Edition);12/4/2000, Issue 48, p40 

    Presents the author's view on the decisions made by the Florida Supreme Court in regard to hand counts in the 2000 United States presidential election. Suggestion that the justices of courts practice judicial activism; Discussion of the Florida State Legislature which may involve itself in the...

  • Federal Offense. Rosen, Jeffrey // New Republic;04/09/2001-04/16/2001, Vol. 224 Issue 15/16, p24 

    Discusses evidence that the conservative-controlled United States Supreme Court is engaging in judicial activism. Assertion that the Court's rulings on what counts as illegal discrimination have overturned the clear will of Congress and state legislatures. Criticism of how Chief Justice William...

  • The Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms the "Employment At-Will" Doctrine. Stevens, Robert C. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the Georgia Supreme Court in Eckhardt, et al. versus Yerkes Regional Primate Center in which it reaffirmed the employment at-will doctrine of the state. The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims by refusing to make an exception to the...

  • Lobbyists must pay careful attention to new rules. Spulak, Tom // Hill;6/27/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 78, p22 

    The article reports on the new rules the gift and travel of the House and Senate under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) regulating the activities of members and staff in U.S. The bills added substantive regulatory provisions to the LDA and will be constituted to a prosecutor's existing arsenal...

  • Democrats Go on the Activist Attack. Schlesinger, Robert // U.S. News Digital Weekly;7/17/2009, Vol. 1 Issue 26, p16 

    The article reports on the aggressiveness of U.S. Democratic senators on the issue of judicial activism, which has long been the conservative field of complaint. It is noted that judicial activism refers to use of decisions to create new laws from the bench and disregarding legal precedents. The...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics