TITLE

A PERIPATETIC VIEW OF JUDICIAL FREE SPEECH

AUTHOR(S)
Spargo, Thomas J.
PUB. DATE
May 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p629
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Looks at the First Amendment rights of judges and judicial candidates to free speech and expressive activities in the U.S. Scope of the constitutional law concerning judicial free speech; Importance of speech and expression in political campaigns; Discussion on the scope of judicial power to interfere with political issues.
ACCESSION #
17510554

 

Related Articles

  • JUDICIAL CAMPAIGN SPEECH RESTRICTIONS: SOME LITIGATION NUTS AND BOLTS. Weber, Walter M. // Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p635 

    Looks at the context of constitutional challenges to restrictions on the speech of candidates for judicial office in the U.S. Categories of campaign speech limitations; Discussion on the posture of challenges to campaign speech limitations; Information on several technical issues that may...

  • Judicial Line-Drawing and the Broader Culture: The Case of Politics and Entertainment. Wright, R. George // San Diego Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p341 

    The article focuses on the boundaries of judicial line-drawing in entertainment law in the U.S. after the judgment in the U.S. court case Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association. Information is provided on the case, which dealt with free speech and constitutional law. The author discusses...

  • O JUST JUDGE!  // America;11/23/1940, Vol. 64 Issue 7, p184 

    The author reflects on the judicial power acquired by judges. He mentions that people has an important task in insisting competent judges because of their knowledge. He explains that judges should promote respect for law and order. He explains that there is an existing judicial function for...

  • The Awesome Power of Federal Judges.  // Saturday Evening Post;May/Jun1975, Vol. 247 Issue 4, p36 

    Comments on the exercise of federal judicial power in the U.S. Influence of the policy of judicial restraint on judges; Possibilities for injustice associated with punishment for obstructing justice based on failure to cooperate with an investigation.

  • A COSTLY SIGNALING THEORY OF "HARD LOOK" JUDICIAL REVIEW. Stephenson, Matthew C. // Administrative Law Review;Fall2006, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p753 

    The article looks into the significance if judicial review in the U.S. The author emphasizes the authority of judges to review the decisions of other government bodies. He also explains that the judicial review involves abstract questions of law. Moreover, it tends to assess a government...

  • Theorizing Disagreement: Reconceiving the Relationship Between Law and Politics. Post, Robert // California Law Review;Aug2010, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p1319 

    The article explores whether technical legal craft can be joined to the virtue of judicial statesmanship in the U.S. It says that the fusion of craftsmanship and statesmanship highlights the tension that has encompassed the American constitutional law. It offers a sociological explanation of the...

  • PERSPECTIVES ON JUDICIAL SELECTION REFORM: THE NEED TO DEVELOP A MODEL APPOINTIVE SELECTION PLAN FOR JUDGES IN LIGHT OF EXPERIENCE. Greene, Norman L. // Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p597 

    Addresses the need to develop a model appointive selection plan for judicial selection reform in the U.S. Discussion on the different forms of judicial selection; Structure and code of conduct of a judicial nominating commission; Scope of judicial selection reform.

  • Politics Involved in Early Attacks on Judicial Powers.  // Congressional Digest;Dec35, Vol. 14 Issue 12, p294 

    Examines the involvement of politics in the early attacks on judicial powers in the United States. Opposition to the appointment of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the United States; Repeal of the Circuit Court Act of 1801; Power of the Supreme Court to declare Acts of Congress as...

  • THE GREAT AND POWERFUL OZ REVEALED: THE ETHICS AND WISDOM OF THE SCOTUS LEAKS IN NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS V. SEBELIUS. Schaffzin, Katharine Traylor // Charleston Law Review;Winter2012/2013, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p317 

    The article discusses the issue on whether Justices of the Supreme Court of the U.S. can or should discuss details of deliberations with the press. It answers the question by addressing the ethical implications of such statements from the Court, the conflict between the restrictions on judicial...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics