TITLE

WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS, DEMOCRACY AND JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION: THE HOBGOBLIN OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM

AUTHOR(S)
Edelman, Martin
PUB. DATE
May 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p585
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Addresses the role of judicial interpretation in the establishment and definition of democracy in the U.S. Discussion on the justification of the value of democracy; Importance of separating judicial from political issues on the interpretation of democratic theory; Impact of democracy on extra-constitutional ideas of courts in the U.S.
ACCESSION #
17510534

 

Related Articles

  • One Vote Shy of Tyranny. Jeffrey, Terence P. // Human Events;07/07/2000, Vol. 56 Issue 25, p1 

    Criticizes the judicial activism embarked upon by the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court. Ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Stenberg versus Carhart which legalized partial-birth abortion; Verdict on the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Boy Scout of America versus Dale; Discussion on...

  • Here come the judge-bashers. Smithson, Carla // Report / Newsmagazine (Alberta Edition);04/24/2000, Vol. 26 Issue 52, p14 

    Focuses on the debate over judicial activism in Canada. Concern that the courts are controlled by special interest groups and have taken over the power of elected parliamentarians; Reference to a March 22, 2000 article by Alberta jurist Roger Kerans in the `Globe and Mail' about judge-bashing.

  • Con Job. Ponnuru, Ramesh // National Review;1/27/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p36 

    The article focuses on a symposium regarding judicial activism in the United States. The symposium "The End of Democracy: The Judicial Usurpation of Politics," which was organized by the periodical "First Things," focused on issues related to judicial activism. The symposium's participants...

  • The International Court of Justice and International Law-making: The Judicial Activism/Self-Restraint Antinomy. McWhinney, Edward // Chinese Journal of International Law;Mar2006, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p3 

    The antinomy between judicial activism and self-restraint, well known to students of the US Supreme Court, has implications today also for international tribunals. The resort to judicial settlement of international dispute is still predicated upon a certain basic homogeneity of legal cultures...

  • Recent Supreme Court Decisions Show:. Taylor Jr., Stuart // Newsweek;7/7/2008, Vol. 152 Issue 1/2, p46 

    The article reports on the partisan leanings of members of the U.S. Supreme Court. A decision to strike down a Washington, D.C. handgun ban reflects a political divide on the bench, with a conservative majority. Inconsistencies in the justices' opinions and legal principles also highlight the...

  • MEESE V. BRENNAN. Taylor, Jr., Stuart // New Republic;1/6/86 - 1/13/86, Vol. 194 Issue 1/2, p17 

    Presents arguments of U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, regarding the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Statement that the conservative political agenda of Meese is criticized for denouncing rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court; Tendency of judges to apply constitutional principles in novel...

  • Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia. Weiden, David L. // Political Research Quarterly;Jun2011, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p335 

    This article proposes a new cross-national thesis for judicial decision making. The judicial politicization theory posits that judges on highly politicized high courts will be more likely to decide cases using ideological and attitudinal factors than judges at less politicized courts. The theory...

  • VOTING IN TRIAL COURT ELECTIONS: BALLOT ROLL-OFF IN PARTISAN, NONPARTISAN, AND RETENTION ELECTIONS IN HIGH-POPULATION COUNTIES. SHORTELL, CHRISTOPHER // Justice System Journal;2013, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p153 

    Most of the empirical research on judicial elections is focused on state courts of last resort. It is at the trial court level, though, that most judicial elections take place. Using an original data set of over 1,100 trial court elections in 19 different jurisdictions, this article highlights...

  • A Conservative View of the Court. Greve, Michael S. // National Review;6/16/2003, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p35 

    This article focuses on judicial activism in the United States Supreme Court. Republicans must recognize that judicial activism is a question of constitutional substance, not judicial style. The Supreme Court's federalism decisions led to the discovery of judicial activism. Judicial activism is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics