TITLE

Immunity Not a Given for Fire Chiefs

AUTHOR(S)
Stittleburg, Philip
PUB. DATE
June 2005
SOURCE
Fire Chief;Jun2005, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the legal issues concerning government immunity to fire chiefs in the United States. Governmental immunity is a provision in the law created, in part, to protect government officials from claims against them arising from the performance of their official duties. The question of whether a fire chief was entitled to the protection of governmental immunity arose recently in a Michigan case. The trial court ruled that the highest executive officer of a department within a township was not absolutely immune under the Michigan statute, because the township supervisor who hired the fire chief was actually the highest-elected or highest-appointed executive official in the level of government within which the fire department was organized, that being the township.
ACCESSION #
17460892

 

Related Articles

  • GA Tax Challenge Barred by Sovereign Immunity.  // Sales & Use Tax Alert;3/1/2010, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p5 

    The article discusses the court case Georgia Department of Revenue v. Roof which was dismissed on the bases of sovereign immunity.

  • Hospital's apology ends contentious litigation.  // Healthcare Risk Management;Mar2010, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p30 

    A hospital president's impromptu apology immediately ended a highly publicized lawsuit involving a celebrity. The case illustrates the power of saying "I'm sorry," even when the litigation is far along. ∎ The hospital president apologized on the spur of the moment. ∎ There had been no...

  • I never dreamed my malpractice trial would end like this. Haswell, John N. // Medical Economics;03/09/98, Vol. 75 Issue 5, p51 

    Offers information on a malpratice lawsuit involving the patient Vivian Andrews and John N. Haswell, M.D. Background information on Haswell's profession; Indepth look at Andrews idea to have a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC); What the procedure would involved; Details on the lawsuit.

  • Chapter 10: The Ombudsman.  // TI Source Book 2000: Confronting Corruption;2000, p83 

    Chapter 10 of the book "Confronting Corruption: The Elements of a National Integrity System" is presented. It offers information about the existence of the Office of the Ombudsman, and its role in the manifestation of an effective social governance. It discusses the Office's integral functions...

  • SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.  // International Law Update;Nov2001, Vol. 7, p169 

    Focuses on the case of Robinson versus the government of Malaysia. Details of the case; Decision of the court to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Reference to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

  • Malpractice: The Lessons In Other Surgeons' Woes. Weber, Paul // Review of Ophthalmology;Dec2001 Part 1of 2, Vol. 8 Issue 12, p24 

    Presents steps to avoid malpractice suits among ophthalmologists. Probability of incurring a claim by ophthalmologist according to the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company; Analysis of decision whether to settle the case or go to trial; Importance of good documentation.

  • PHYSICIANS ATTRIBUTE HIGHER COSTS TO DEFENSIVE MEDICINE.  // Medical Economics;3/19/2010, Vol. 87 Issue 6, p13 

    The article reports on a study that showed physicians attribute 26% of overall healthcare costs to the practice of ordering extra tests, referrals, procedures and hospitalizations to protect themselves from medical malpractice lawsuits.

  • Want to countersue? It's not that easy. Johnson, Lee J. // Medical Economics;10/11/99, Vol. 76 Issue 19, p179 

    Replies to an inquiry on a physician's ability to file a countersuit against a patient whose malpractice was dismissed by a court. Requirements for filing countersuits; Evidence needed to prevail in a countersuit; Obstacles to winning countersuits.

  • Suppose you're sued?  // Accounting Technology;Mar99, Vol. 15 Issue 2, pSR-10 

    Discusses how accountants can defend themselves in a malpractice lawsuit by asking themselves certain basic questions. Screening clients carefully as the best defense against litigation according to DPIC Cos. Inc.; Specific factors that should be discussed when evaluating the client.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics