Employment agencies hike fees to fund staff holidays

Whitehead, Mark
December 1998
People Management;12/10/98, Vol. 4 Issue 24, p12
Focuses on the move of employment agencies in Great Britain to raise their charges within the first week of the European working time regulations coming into force. Reason behind the move; Details on the working time regulations; Problem in dealing with temporary, part-time and casual staff.


Related Articles

  • Agencies will be responsible for hours offences.  // Commercial Motor;5/11/2006, Vol. 203 Issue 5177, p13 

    The article focuses on a legislation which would require the use of digital tachographs on new vehicles. It will have the effect of making consignors, freight forwarders and driver agencies liable for drivers' hours offences in Great Britain. Agencies will also be held responsible for ensuring...

  • Shared responsibility. Cole, Louise // Commercial Motor;7/27/2006, Vol. 204 Issue 5188, p9 

    The article reflects on the significance of the revised working time directive to the trucking industry in Great Britain. It cites that the measure will consider agencies, freight forwarders and consignors as responsible for the violation of working hours regulations. It emphasizes the necessity...

  • WTD drives up agency costs. Semple, Jack // Motor Transport;7/24/2003, p9 

    Reports on the impact of the costs imposed by the Working Time Directive Horizontal Amending Directive on driver agencies in Great Britain. Percentage added by Rapier Employment to its charge rates for drivers; Amount added by the regulations to the annual age bill of Rapier Employment; Reason...

  • Keeping agencies legal. Blakesley, Andrew // Motor Transport;6/7/2007, p12 

    The author stresses the responsibility of recruitment agencies to provide legal and safe drivers. He cites the advantage and disadvantage of the new Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) scheme. He discusses a river assessment solution developed by Protemp in partnership with ISV Software....

  • EU court postpones working hours ruling. Littlefield, David // People Management;07/25/96, Vol. 2 Issue 15, p8 

    Reports the postponement of the European Court of Justice's decision on working hours of Britain's workers. Details on the directive; British government's argument on business policies; Directive's impact to employers and employees.

  • UK companies forced to comply with 48-hour rule. Walsh, Jennie // People Management;04/16/98, Vol. 4 Issue 8, p12 

    Highlights Great Britain's working time directive that will take in effect in October 1998. Employees' legal right to at least three weeks' paid annual leaves; Regular rest breaks; Maximum 48-hour working week; Criticisms against exclusions and opt-outs; Special protection to young and...

  • Working hours policy.  // Congressional Digest;May97, Vol. 76 Issue 5, p132 

    Traces the development of public policy regarding Federal regulation of working hours and pressures for the modification of that policy in the United States. Pay requirements for hours of work and overtime; Public relations campaign for reforms on work schedules; Calculation of compensation...

  • Britain fails to stop 48 hour week limit. White, Caroline // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/23/96, Vol. 313 Issue 7068, p1283 

    Reports on the failure of Great Britain to have European Union's working time directive annulled by the European Court of Justice in November 1996. Stipulation under the directive; Exemptions in the directive; Argument by British government; Junior doctors' stand on the issue. INSET: Key...

  • THE LAW: CAN YOU FORCE YOUR EMPLOYEES TO WORK LONG HOURS?  // Caterer & Hotelkeeper;2/18/2011, Vol. 201 Issue 4665, p7 

    The article reports on Great Britain's Working Time Regulations that stipulates that employers must ensure that workers' average working time doesn't exceed 48 hours a week.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics