TITLE

A bit of a tall order

AUTHOR(S)
Williams, Audrey
PUB. DATE
October 1998
SOURCE
People Management;10/1/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 19, p23
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses some of the court cases regarding the required height for job applicants in Great Britain. Lincoln Dodds versus Sun Valley Foods Ltd.; London Underground Ltd. versus Edwards; Facts on the cases.
ACCESSION #
1742488

 

Related Articles

  • Underground war.  // Lawyer (Online Edition); 

    The article reports on the settlement of a professional negligence dispute by Freshfields and Herbert Smith with London Underground Ltd.

  • East London Line out of courts.  // Rail Business Intelligence;7/17/2003, Issue 202, p7 

    Discusses the order of the British Court of Appeal on July 7, 2003 lifting an injunction preventing London Underground from demolishing arches supporting the abandoned Bishopsgate goods yard in England. Implications of the decision for the northern extension of the East London Line (ELL) to...

  • Morals of support. Stanton, Robert // Employers Law;Sep2003, p20 

    Discusses the right of employees to be accompanied at disciplinary and grievance hearings. Instances when a worker is entitled to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union official; Significance of understanding the scope of the right; Overview of court cases involving London Underground Ltd.

  • month in tribunals.  // Employers Law;Sep2011, p6 

    The article presents key employment tribunal decisions on workplace issues. In Ruda v. TEi Ltd, the tribunal held that Mr. Ruda was subjected to racial and sexual orientation discrimination after being called "Borat." In Thomson & others v. London Underground Ltd. the tribunal noted that it is a...

  • End of the line.  // Works Management;May2005, Vol. 58 Issue 5, p13 

    Focuses on the Court of Appeal case "Strouthos v. London Underground Ltd.," which involves employee dismissal, in Great Britain. Facts of the case; Factors that an Employment Tribunal will look at when considering of dismissal for misconduct was unfair; Opinion of the court.

  • R (on the application of Hammerton) v London Underground Ltd and others. Dobson, Sally // Estates Gazette;11/23/2002, Issue 247, p148 

    Provides information on the ruling of an administrative court in Great Britain on a case regarding the time limit in town and country planning involving several real estate developers, including London Underground Ltd. Facts of the case; Reasons behind the ruling of the court; Arguments...

  • Planning hits the buffers. Edwards, Martin; Martin, John // Estates Gazette;8/2/2003, Issue 331, p66 

    Assesses the fallout for the city planning system caused by the judgment of the British Court of Appeal in R versus London Underground Ltd. Facts of the case; Consequences of Prokopp.

  • Freshfields calls in Tony Grabiner QC to defend £140m negligence claim. Dowell, Katy // Lawyer (Online Edition);7/8/2013, p8 

    The article reports that defense of professional negligence claim against Bruckhaus Deringer by London Underground Ltd. (LUL) will be led by bar heavyweight Tony Grabiner of One Essex Court. It is noted that Ince & Co. partner Charlotte Davies is acting for London Underground and the parties are...

  • The Labour Injunction and Industrial Action Ballots. Simpson, Bob // Industrial Law Journal;Mar2013, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p54 

    The article focuses on labour injunction proceedings and the necessities that an industrial action ballot has to satisfy in context to industrial actions. It also highlights the role of employers' legal advisers in influencing a judge's decision indicating interim relief standards are...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics