TITLE

Legal checklist

AUTHOR(S)
Aikin, Olga
PUB. DATE
December 1998
SOURCE
People Management;12/24/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 25, p19
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Summarizes court decisions on several employment cases in Great Britain. Boyle versus Equal Opportunities Commission; Foster versus Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service; Hill versus General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corp.
ACCESSION #
1742255

 

Related Articles

  • Employment tribunal considers its verdict. Massie, Graeme // Nursing Standard;2/4/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 21, p6 

    Reports on the case of Maria Cook, former regional director of Royal College of Nursing (RCN), who claim that she was a victim of constructive dismissal and racial discrimination. John Humpston, trh RCN's acting director's rejection of Cook's claim that she was the victim of racial discrimination.

  • Three Full Days' Incapacity Needed for FMLA Leave. Danaher, Maria Greco // HR Magazine;Jan2004, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p101 

    Reports on the ruling of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in October 2003 on the case between Margaret Russell and North Broward Hospital regarding the rights of Russell under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)l. Provisions of the FMLA; Facts of the case; Root of dispute between...

  • Veganism is not a protected religious creed in California. Hatch, D. Diane // Workforce (10928332);Jul2003, Vol. 82 Issue 7, p16 

    Discusses the lawsuit filed by Jerold Friedman, a strict vegetarian, against Kaiser Foundation Hospitals for religious creed discrimination and retaliation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Reason of the California Court of Appeal for dismissing his claims; Definition of...

  • FMLA work time rule does not require continuous service: Appeals court. Greenwald, Judy // Business Insurance;12/25/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 52, p4 

    The article focuses on the case Kenneth Rucker vs. Lee Holding Co. In overturning a lower court's decision, a federal court stresses that the 12 months of service an employee is required to work before becoming eligible for leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act does not...

  • Workplace harassment. Mason, Louise // Employers Law;Jun2005, p8 

    Discusses the Protection From Harassment Act (PHA) 1997 in Great Britain. Information on the decision of the Court of Appeal in the Majrowski versus Guy's and Saint Thomas' National Health Service Trust Supreme court case; Purpose of the PHA; Advantages of a claim under the PHA to an employee.

  • GRIFFITHS V. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SEVEN STARS FARM, INC.). Brown, Sarah // Widener Law Journal;2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p495 

    Analyzes the compensation statute of workers on medical expenses and transportation coverage in Pennsylvania in the case Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Provisions of the compensation statute; Arguments in favored and opposed to the court decision; Violation of employer to the...

  • GIBSON V. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ARMCO STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS): THE DISPARITY BETWEEN EXPERT AND LAY TESTIMONY. Hay, Jessica // Widener Law Journal;2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p505 

    Examines the case Gibson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Cause of death of decedent linked to asbestos; Factual and legal background of the case; Decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court influenced by competent evidence presented.

  • JEANES HOSPITAL V. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (HASS): DEFINING THE PROCEDURE TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL INJURY TO A NOTICE OF COMPENSATION PAYABLE. Meng, Katherine A. // Widener Law Journal;2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p547 

    Defines the procedure in filing a Petition to Review Notice of Compensation Payable (NCP) in the case Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. History and origin of section 413(a) provision of the Workers' Compensation Act; Amendment of NCP including additional injuries in...

  • Strict Company Notice Rules Squelch FMLA Rights. Danaher, Maria Greco // HR Magazine;Jan2004, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p101 

    Reports on the ruling of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in October 2003 on the case between Samuel Cavin and Honda of America regarding the rights of Cavin under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Provisions of the FMLA; Facts of the case; Root of dispute between Cavin and Honda.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics