TITLE

EU, Russia in legal meeting of minds

AUTHOR(S)
Nuthall, Keith
PUB. DATE
June 2005
SOURCE
Lawyer;6/13/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 23, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that European Union and Russia have agreed to deepen their cooperation over judicial matters, examining potential joint projects to ensure the independence and effectiveness of both sides' court systems.
ACCESSION #
17407109

 

Related Articles

  • L'Union européenne et le narco-système mondial. Estievenart, Georges // Sécurité Globale;printemps2012, Issue 19, p11 

    Only in the late '80s became the European Union an international actor in the fight against drugs. Limited at first to police and customs cooperation, its action was reinforced by the successive treaties (Maastricht, Amsterdam, Nice and, most recently, Lisbon). Its competences on these issues,...

  • LAIKINOSIOS APSAUGOS PRIEMONÄ–S - NACIONALINÄ–S TEISÄ–S NETAIKYMAS KAIP VEIKSMINGOS TEISMINÄ–S GYNYBOS EUROPOS SÄ„JUNGOJE SUDÄ–TINÄ– DALIS. Samuilytė-Mamontovė, Aistė // Socialiniu Mokslu Studijos;2014, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p135 

    The principle of loyal cooperation established in the EU law obliges the courts of the Member States of the EU to ensure the effective judicial protection of rights of persons stemming from the EU law. In the absence of harmonized norms of the civil procedure at the EU level, national courts are...

  • ENGAGING RUSSIA'S NEAR ABROAD FROM ABOVE. Almond, Roncevert // Turkish Policy Quarterly;Fall2014, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p93 

    Aviation is a major globalizing force for the transfer of people, goods, and power, as well as a tool of positive statecraft. Through intergovernmental and transnational relationships, the United States and European Union have helped countries such as Ukraine and Azerbaijan build...

  • Singing from the Same Hymn Sheet? What the Differences between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg Courts Tell Us about Religious Freedom, Non-Discrimination, and the Secular State. Mccrea, Ronan // Oxford Journal of Law & Religion;Jun2016, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p183 

    This article considers how the approach of the European Union (EU) and its Court of Justice to religion maps on to that of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). It will show that there is a high degree of convergence but that the broader remit of the Luxembourg Court means that its...

  • Eyes on CETA Ratification Ahead of EU Trade Committee Vote.  // Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest;1/19/2017, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p9 

    The article focuses on ratification of European Union (EU)-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) ahead of European Parliament's International Trade Committee (INTA) vote, and mentions the final opinion of European Court of Justice (ECJ) on EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

  • EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONALISM V. REFORMED CONSTITUTION FOR EUROPE. Vaicaitis, Vaidotas A. // Jurisprudencija;2010, Vol. 1 Issue 119, p69 

    The very idea of the draft European Union (EU) Constitutional Treaty was reexamined after the failed French and Dutch referendums and the Treaty of Lisbon (also known as the Reform Treaty) was drafted and entered into force on 1 December 2009 after it's ratification by all 27 member states. The...

  • EFFET UTILE AND NATIONAL PRACTICE: IS THERE A ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? Škrk, Alenka Berger // InterEULawEast: Journal for International & European Law, Econom;Jun2014, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p113 

    Effet utile as a general principle of EU law is always "bound" on the dilemmas of the effective enforcement of EU law, more particularly, on the dilemmas of the judicial protection of EU-based rights through national and also EU remedies. This article is centered on three topics: first, on the...

  • IPBES: Biodiversity panel should play by rules. Opgenoorth, Lars; Hotes, Stefan; Mooney, Harold // Nature;2/13/2014, Vol. 506 Issue 7487, p159 

    The article focuses on the initial work programme for 2014-2018 issued by the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) including R1 for a decentralized approach, R5 for cautious optimism and R4 for nominations process for Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP).

  • Introducción. Argomaniz, Javier; Casado, Rut Bermejo // Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals;sep/oct2010, Issue 91, preceding p8 

    No abstract available.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics