Legal checklist

Aikin, Olga
September 1998
People Management;9/17/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 18, p21
Summarizes court decisions on employment-related litigations in Great Britain. Brown versus Rentokil Ltd.; Webb versus EMO Air Cargo Ltd.; Acas versus Taylor.


Related Articles

  • Labor Secretary Ordered to Certify Second Election Results.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug69, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p562 

    This article reports on decisions made by federal district court in Ohio ordering the secretary of the Department of Labor in the U.S. to certify second election results in the case Wirtz versus Electrical Workers. The Secretary of Labor's refusal to validate the results of a second union...

  • Notes and Recent Decisions. Bordon, Martin; Gregory, Noble K.; Daily Jr., Allan F. // California Law Review;Mar1946, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p245 

    Presents an update on court decisions in the U.S. as of March 1946. Right of supervisory employees to bargain collectively under provisions of the National Labor Relations Act; Effect of reletting by the landlord; Decisions dealing with state income tax status of a war contractor in regard to...

  • Legal checklist. Aikin, Olga // People Management;12/24/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 25, p19 

    Summarizes court decisions on several employment cases in Great Britain. Boyle versus Equal Opportunities Commission; Foster versus Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service; Hill versus General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corp.

  • WATCH THIS SPACE.  // Employers Law;May2003, p12 

    Presents news briefs related to employment law in Great Britain as of May 2003. Court opinion on the case Kiel versus Jaeger on on-call hours for doctors; Decision on case on part-time employees.

  • WILDCAT OIL DRILLER'S EMPLOYEES NOT UNDER FLSA.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan58, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p42 

    The article focuses on the "wildcat" oil driller which sank at a place where there was no reasonable prospect of striking oil. The employees were not paid the statutory minimum wage and overtime wage, even the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was held to be inapplicable. The court of appeals for...

  • Bargaining Impasse Can Bring on Quick Changes.  // Labor Law Journal;May68, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p316 

    This article focuses on a ruling issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals at Washington, D.C. which held that an employer did not breach any bargaining duty when, on the afternoon that a bargaining impasse was reached, he announced that changes encompassed in his bargaining proposals would be...

  • Union Campaign Is Not a License for Misconduct.  // Labor Law Journal;May68, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p317 

    This article focuses on a ruling issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals at Cincinnati on a discrimination case National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) versus Bangor Plastics Inc. According to the court, union membership and activities is not a shield behind which a discharged employee can take refuge...

  • Union Contract Doesn't Survive Relocation of Plant.  // Labor Law Journal;May68, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p317 

    This article focuses on a ruling issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals on the case of the National Labor Relations Board versus Die Supply Corp. over a union contract. When an employer relocated a plant that was covered by a union contract, the contract did not carry over and remain in effect at...

  • Wages...Hours.  // Labor Law Journal;Oct52, Vol. 3 Issue 10, p712 

    The article focuses on consequent problems that have crept up following the rulings of labor boards with respect of wage disputes involving the employees and employers. In one ruling the Wage Stabilization Board warns employers not to grant general increases to employees under the guise of merit...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics