TITLE

Early Termination Fees a State of Concern

AUTHOR(S)
Rockwell, Mark
PUB. DATE
June 2005
SOURCE
Wireless Week;6/15/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 13, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the request of wireless carriers to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to assert itself on jurisdiction over early termination fees (ETF) in the U.S. Emergence of class action lawsuits over ETF in state courts; Anticipation of the carriers on the classification of ETF as federal regulatory according to Janee Briesemeister, Consumer Union senior policy analyst; Remarks from Roger Entner, vice president of wireless telecom at Ovum, on the cases.
ACCESSION #
17331668

 

Related Articles

  • Pay Now, Switch Later.  // njbiz;12/1/2003, Vol. 16 Issue 48, p2 

    Reports on the decision of cellular carriers in the U.S. to charge a monthly fee from their subscribers to recoup the costs of complying with a rule from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission that lets customers keep their wireless numbers when changing carriers. Range of fees; Increase in...

  • LET'S CUT THIS SHORT. Hogan, Mike // Entrepreneur;Sep2008, Vol. 36 Issue 9, p46 

    The article reports that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has taken up the issue on early termination fees (ETFs), one of cellular telephone users' biggest complain. It states that there is a proposal designed to modify the way ETFs are applied rather than eliminate them...

  • Consumers take T-Mobile termination fees to court. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;11/20/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 47, p1 

    This article deals with the legal issues facing T-Mobile USA Inc. T-Mobile USA, in November 2006, was hit with a class-action lawsuit on its early termination fee (ETF) policy. The action involves more than 100 class members and monetary damage exceeds $5 million exclusive of interest and costs....

  • Lawmakers urge FCC to allow state regulation of early-termination fees. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR Wireless News;8/15/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 33, p7 

    Focuses on the efforts of several U.S. Democratic House members led by Representative Anthony Weiner (D.-N.Y.) to urge the Federal Communications Commission to reject a wireless-industry petition that would prohibit state regulation of early-termination fees. Issues raised by lawmakers...

  • 3M wireless users ported--and counting. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR Wireless News;8/15/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 33, p11 

    Focuses on a report that wireless customers have switched from providers and taken their telephone numbers with them since the launch of wireless local number portability (LNP), according to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's Wireline Competition Bureau. Total number of wireless...

  • New Kentucky wireless tax on hold until appeals court ruling comes down. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;1/16/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p3 

    The article focuses on the delays in the implementation of wireless tax in Kentucky after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a case filed by the cellular telephone services industry against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The industry denounces the ban on the passing of...

  • Cell Phones, Contracts, and Capitalism. Neiger, Chris // Campus Activities Programming;Sep2008, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p69 

    The author addresses the new T-Mobile early termination fees (ETFs), which started in the U.S. on June 28, 2008. He provides a breakdown of new fees. He believes the cellular telephone industry needs to reassess competition rules. He considers the response of the Federal Communications...

  • CONSUMER VICTORY.  // Consumer Reports;Jan2013, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p6 

    The article looks at measures that help cell-phone customers avoid unexpected charges on their bills. It is noted that U.S. wireless service providers including AT&T, Verizon, and others agreed in 2011 to begin sending free alerts about charges related to users' data, text, voice, and...

  • Real Class Act: The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005's Amount in Controversy Requirement, Removal, and the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard. Elliotte Quinn IV, F. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jan2011, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p85 

    The article tackles the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) in the U.S. and provides an in-depth explanation of the statute. It evaluates the adoption of circuit courts to preponderance of the evidence standard and the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts. It also discusses the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics