Goldman Faces Trial For Role in eToys IPO

June 2005
Investment Dealers' Digest;6/13/2005, Vol. 71 Issue 23, p4
Trade Publication
Reports on the ruling of the New York State of Court requiring Goldman Sachs & Co. to face trial in the case of Internet toy retailer EToys Inc., which alleged that the investment bank mishandled its 1999 IPO. Impact of the lawsuit on the corporate image of the investment bank; Details of the case; Allegations of the retailer against the bank.


Related Articles

  • New York Court of Appeals Decision Creates Significant Risks that Underwriters May be Deemed Fiduciaries. Brown Jr., David E.; Garris, Dennis O.; Latham, John; McElreath, Mark F.; Miller, Kevin // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q2, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in the case of EBC I Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. in June 2005 on breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the initial public offering of eToys common stock. Because of this, underwriters are expected to make changes to their...

  • Banks Dealt Legal Blow in Amsterdam. MacFadyen, Ken // Investment Dealers' Digest;5/14/2007, Vol. 73 Issue 19, p3 

    The article reports on the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeals on the case filed against ABN Amro Inc. and Goldman Sachs & Co. linked to the initial public offering (IPO) of World Online company, for which they served as lead underwriters in the Netherlands. The court ruled against the...

  • Does Wall Street Have a Fiduciary Duty to Investors? Kranacher, Mary-Jo // CPA Journal;Jun2010, Vol. 80 Issue 6, p80 

    The author comments on the civil charges and criminal investigation facing investment banker Goldman Sachs and explores whether banks have a fiduciary responsibility to their clients and investors. She believes that although Goldman has no fiduciary duty under federal or state law, it has a...

  • The SEC v. Goldman Sachs: Reputation, Trust, and Fiduciary Duties in Investment Banking. Davidoff, Steven M.; Morrison, Alan D.; Wilhelm, Jr., William J. // Journal of Corporation Law;Spring2012, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p529 

    The article focuses on the U.S. court case U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Goldman Sachs, which dealt with fiduciary duties in investment banking. Topics include trust-based agreements, the management and regulation of investment banks in the U.S., and synthetic collateralized debt...

  • EToys plans public offering.  // Playthings;Mar99, Vol. 97 Issue 3, p8 

    Focuses on EToys Inc.'s initial public offering in February 1999. Plan to use sale proceeds for general corporate purposes; Earnings for funding growth.

  • Bias verdict dismissed. Harrington, John // Crain's New York Business;11/15/93, Vol. 9 Issue 46, p46 

    Reports on federal Judge Kimba L. Wood's dismissal of a jury verdict against Goldman, Sachs & Co. for alleged sex discrimination. Lack of evidence from plaintiff Joanne Flynn, former Goldman vice president.

  • Squashing Goldman Vampire Squid. Baker, Dean // Progressive Populist;5/15/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p8 

    The article discusses the allegations against Goldman Sachs & Co. which highlights the pressing need to break the big banks as well as introduce strict financial regulation in the U.S.

  • Goldman Sachs Points to Magnetar Trades in Its Defense. Wang, Marian // Pro Publica;4/18/2010, p2 

    A blog related to Goldman Sachs & Co. denying in its trial that its invesments were built to fail is discussed.

  • Goldman loses civil suit. Harrington, John // Crain's New York Business;11/1/93, Vol. 9 Issue 44, p66 

    Reports on a federal jury decision finding the investment firm Goldman, Sachs & Co. guilty of sex discrimination for blocking the promotion of a former female employee. Unclear status of the civil suit; Consideration of a defense motion.


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics