TITLE

Hammered & Nailed

AUTHOR(S)
HAUGH, RICHARD
PUB. DATE
March 1999
SOURCE
H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks;Mar99, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p18
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the case filed by enrollees against Humana, a Louisville, Kentucky health maintenance organization. Decision of the Supreme Court on the case; Basis of the decision; Caution to those who signed the contracts with Humana.
ACCESSION #
1725102

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court Holds That Federal Law is not Preempted Under McCarran-Ferguson Act Unless It Directly Conflicts With State Law, Frustrates Any Declared State Policy or Interferes With State's Ad...  // Journal of Insurance Regulation;Spring99, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p429 

    Discusses the clarification of the United States Supreme Court in the Humana versus Forsyth case about the preemption analysis used to determine when a federal law is preempted by the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Reason for the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act civil lawsuit filed by Mary...

  • High court upholds the right of Medicare patients to sue their HMOs. Rose, Joan R. // Medical Economics;12/3/2001, Vol. 78 Issue 23, p14 

    Reports on the refusal of the United States Supreme Court to conduct a trial on a lawsuit filed by a Medicare patient against a health maintenance organization for denying needed medical care. Brief information on the case; Reason for the refusal.

  • Humana RICO Ruling May Have Broader Effects. BELL, ALLISON // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;2/1/99, Vol. 103 Issue 5, p3 

    Reports on the predicted consequences of the ruling by the United States Supreme Court on the lawsuit filed against Humana under the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Prediction from Jason Adkins, a Boston attorney who represents the policyholders; Statement from Justice...

  • Top court supports RICO suit. BELL, ALLISON // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;01/25/99, Vol. 103 Issue 4, p3 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court that would affect the McCarran-Ferguson Act. How the court permitted a group of employees that held coverage from Humana Health Insurance of Nevada to sue the company under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act;...

  • Ruling on RICO, high court narrows McCarran-Ferguson. BELL, ALLISON // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;1/25/99, Vol. 103 Issue 4, p1 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court that narrows the scope of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, a law protecting the ability of states to regulate the insurance industry. Law suit against Humana Health Insurance of Nevada; Information on the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt...

  • RICO may apply in HMO case.  // Business Insurance;01/25/99, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p2 

    Cites a United States Supreme Court decision that the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) may be applied in the insurance fraud case filed by Nevada residents against health maintenance organization Humana Inc. Allegations of overcharging on copayments for hospital...

  • Court: Insurers can be sued under RICO. Weinstock, Matthew // AHA News;01/25/99, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p4 

    Focuses on the ruling of the United States Supreme Court that insurance companies can be sued under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), an anti-racketeering law. Information on the ruling under the case `Humana Inc. versus Forsyth'; Argument of Humana Inc. against the...

  • TREATMENT DECISIONS MADE BY HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION PHYSICIAN EMPLOYEES ARE NOT FIDUCIARY ACTS SUBJECT TO ACTION UNDER ERISA.  // Journal of Insurance Regulation;Fall2000, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p144 

    Examines the June 12, 2000 ruling of the United States Supreme Court over the decisions made by the physician employees of health maintenance organizations regarding the eligibility and treatment of plan participants. Details of the case; Main issue of the case; Conclusion of the court on the case.

  • Insurers Can't Escape the Grasp of RICO. Crisp, Kristen E.; Muldowney, Timothy J. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jul99, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p429 

    Discusses the implications of a case holding a health insurance plan subject to a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Reorganizations Act (RICO) suit. Decision of the United States Supreme Court on the Humana Inc. versus Forsyth case; Why RICO was enacted; Arguments of the Humana defendants on RICO.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics