TITLE

ROMER PARTY PLUS ONE: MANAGING PUBLIC LAW IN COLORADO, 2000-2004

AUTHOR(S)
Feldman, Adam D.
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p445
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the judicial performance of the Colorado Supreme Court from 2000 to 2004. Overview of the Colorado judiciary; Background on the public law decisions published by the court; Role of liberal and conservative justices in voting trends in the context of the collective court.
ACCESSION #
17235728

 

Related Articles

  • Appellate Courts Differ In Viewing Additional PIP. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;8/4/2003, Vol. 114 Issue 29, p14 

    Reports on the varying decision of the appellate courts in viewing additional PIP in the U.S. Details of the lawsuit; Assessment of the subrogation claim; Court judgment.

  • Kinane v Mackie-Conteh. Dobson, Sally // Estates Gazette;2/12/2005, Issue 506, p140 

    Discusses the ruling of the British Court of Appeals on the constructive trust case of Kinane versus Mackie-Conteh. Information on the defense of the respondent to the charges filed by the appellant; Facts of the case; Reasons behind the ruling of the appellate court.

  • Theft:Appropriation and Remoteness. Elliott, Catherine // Journal of Criminal Law;Apr2004, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p103 

    Discusses a court case related to theft. Judgment's emphasis on the issue of remoteness; Distinction between theft and fraud offenses; Trial judge's misdirection of the jury; Court of Appeal's consideration that an act of deceiving an owner to do something is not considered in the meaning of...

  • Legal Briefs. Pollack, Daniel // Corrections Today;Feb99, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p78 

    Summarizes two court decisions on corrections-related lawsuits in the United States. Johnson v Quinones; Mauro v Arpaio.

  • EYES RIGHT. Prosser, Richard // Investigate;Jul2005, Vol. 5 Issue 54, p20 

    Comments on the Adversarial System of Justice being employed in New Zealand. Responsibility of juries in the system; Comparison of the participation of a judge in the Adversarial System and Inquisitorial System; Capability of the Inquisitorial System to determine the truth in a case.

  • YOU SAID IT JUDGE. Hibschman, Harry // Saturday Evening Post;1/22/1944, Vol. 216 Issue 30, p51 

    Presents information on several decisions made by the presiding judge in various court cases in the U.S. State versus Pierce in Oregon in 1932; Pocono Manor Association versus Allen in Pennsylvania in 1940; Giannukos versus Sfiris in Texas in 1935.

  • YOU SAID IT JUDGEÈ“. Hibschman, Harry // Saturday Evening Post;8/26/1944, Vol. 217 Issue 9, p68 

    Presents information on several decisions made by the presiding judge in various court cases in the U.S. People versus Bosch in New York in 1908; Clerken versus Cohen in Illinois in 1942; Rollerstone versus Cassirer & Co. in Georgia in 1907.

  • Judge Bridlegoose's Verdict.  // New Republic;1/3/34, Vol. 77 Issue 996, p212 

    Evaluates the judicial system and patterns used by the German Supreme Court in its verdict fixing responsibility for the Reichstag fire, where it has honored the memory of Judge Bridlegoose, a fifteenth-century jurist who invented an almost infallible method of settling actions at law....

  • How a steambath becomes a bawdyhouse: "Scanty evidence and "undercover" agents. Blacklock, John; Trollope, Paul // Body Politic;Nov77, Issue 38, p7 

    Discusses the decision made by Quebec Court of Appeals Justice G.H. Montgomery on the bawdy house case of Harold Walsh, former manager of the Aquarius Sauna. Facts of the case; Information on the investigation made on the case; Legal analysis given by Montgomery on the case.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics