TITLE

THE SHIFTING OF THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA'S DEATH PENALTY DECISIONS FROM 1998-2003

AUTHOR(S)
Deitz, Laura C.
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p409
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the changes in the death penalty rulings of the Georgia Supreme Court from 1998 to 2003. Transformation of the method of execution in the state; Impact of the retirements and reelections of justices in the court on Georgia death penalty jurisprudence; Background on the voting records of several Georgia justices on death penalty convictions and sentences, including chief justice Norman S. Fletcher.
ACCESSION #
17235659

 

Related Articles

  • CHAPTER X: Execution.  // Badge of Infamy;1/ 1/1963, p36 

    Chapter X of the book "Badge of Infamy" is presented. It describes how the convict was executed by placing him into a spacesuit containing oxygen along with his contaminated belongings and were then released to space. It implies that the law set by the government is fixed and excuses no one.

  • Lightning Still Strikes. McCord, David // Brooklyn Law Review;Winter2005, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p797 

    Argues that the capital punishment system in the U.S. in 2004 continues to be unconstitutionally arbitrary more than three decades after the case Furman versus Georgia. Legal forces that have formed the current death penalty system; Proposal for testing non-arbitrariness; Presentation and...

  • CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE. Kaufman, Edy // Humanist;Nov/Dec1983, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p19 

    Discusses matters related to death penalty from an international perspective as of December 1983. Absence of universal standards governing the imposition and use of death penalty; Methods of execution; Distribution of executions around the world in 1980.

  • Death Penalty Expected To Decline Again in 2005. St. Gerard, Vanessa // Corrections Today;Jun2005, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p17 

    Reports on the expected decline in death penalty in the U.S. in 2005 according to stateline.org. Percentage of decline in death sentences and executions since 1999 according to the Death Penalty Information Center; Limitation of the scope of death penalty by several court decisions.

  • THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND DEATH PENALTY APPEALS. Radelet, Michael L.; Vandiver, Margaret // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1983, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p913 

    This article provides information on death penalty statute enacted by the Florida Supreme Court. Florida was the first state to enact a post-Furman death penalty statute. Immediately after the Furman decision, a special session of the Florida legislature was called for the sole purpose of...

  • Woman escapes stoning with appellate ruling. Donovan, Gill // National Catholic Reporter;4/5/2002, Vol. 38 Issue 22, p10 

    A Muslim appeals court in Nigeria has acquitted a woman who was sentenced to death by stoning for adultery. Safiya Hussaini, 35, had been condemned to death by an October 2001 court ruling on Islamic law, which convicted her of conceiving a child with a married neighbor. When the appellate panel...

  • Supreme Court justice rules on appeal involving $500 fine. BICKFORD, PAUL // Hub (Hay River, NT);12/23/2015, Vol. 43 Issue 44, p7 

    No abstract available.

  • Judicial Narratives of Ideal and Deviant Victims in Judges' Capital Sentencing Decisions. Zaykowski, Heather; Kleinstuber, Ross; McDonough, Caitlin // American Journal of Criminal Justice;Dec2014, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p716 

    Although the Victim's Rights Movement has led to advances for victims of crime, the use of victim impact evidence in criminal trials remains controversial due to the suspicion that such evidence enhances punitive attitudes and arbitrariness in capital sentencing outcomes. Despite a growing body...

  • TEXAS CAPITAL SENTENCING PROCEDURES: THE ROLE OF THE JURY AND THE RESTRAINING HAND OF THE EXPERT. Davis, Peggy C. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1978, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p300 

    The article explores the role of the jury and the restraining hand of the expert in capital sentencing procedures in Texas. The moral, social and legal judgment made by a jury deciding the appropriateness of a death sentence is much like that of a jury deciding the culpability of a defendant who...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics