TITLE

PERSPECTIVES: NOTABLE DISSENTS IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CASES

AUTHOR(S)
Shepard, Randall T.
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p337
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the significance of dissent to law and the process of serving as a judge in state constitutional cases. Uses of a dissenting opinion; Benefits of dissent; Impact of dissents in majority opinions.
ACCESSION #
17235644

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court Decision Exempting Labor From Anti-Racketeering Law.  // Congressional Digest;Jun/Jul43, Vol. 22 Issue 6/7, p167 

    Presents excerpts from the opinion of United States Supreme Court Justice James F. Byrne on the case of the United States v. Local 807 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., as well as the dissenting opinion by Justice Harlan F. Stone. Exemption of labor from the legislation;...

  • "I Must Dissent." Why? Walbolt, Sylvia H.; Zimmerman, Stephanie C. // Florida Bar Journal;Nov2008, Vol. 82 Issue 10, p36 

    The article focuses on the value of dissent, specifically in a case where the highest court in the jurisdiction has ruled and explores the reason why judges decide they must provide their dissenting views. It examines the benefits and detriments of issuing dissenting opinions. It determines that...

  • RAINING ON THE PARADE OF HORRIBLES: OF SLIPPERY SLOPES, FAUX SLOPES, AND JUSTICE SCALIA'S DISSENT IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS. Sternglantz, Ruth E. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jan2005, Vol. 153 Issue 3, p1097 

    Examines the �slippery slope� argument, as used in judicial opinions, so as to distinguish U.S. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia's seeming use of this rhetorical technique in the homosexual sodomy case of �Lawrence v. Texas� from its legitimate uses. Overview of the...

  • How to Read a U.S. Supreme Court Opinion.  // Insights on Law & Society;Fall2012, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p10 

    The article presents a discussion on how to read an opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court. An opinion from the said court has one ore more parts, including the syllabus, main opinion, and concurring and dissenting opinion. It is recommended to take into consideration facts and legal disputes in...

  • Logical and Consistent? An Analysis of Supreme Court Opinions Regarding the Death Penalty. Robinson, Matthew B.; Simon, Kathleen M. // Justice Policy Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p1 

    This paper examines opinions by Supreme Court justices of the most significant death penalty cases of the 1970s and 1980s [i.e., Furman v. Georgia (1972), Gregg v. Georgia (1976), Woodson v. North Carolina (1976), and McCleskey v. Kemp (1987)]. We seek to determine: 1) what main justifications...

  • All for one. Dowell, Katy // Lawyer;4/21/2014, p1 

    The article focuses on how British Supreme Court President Lord David Neuberger may be contributing to the decrease in dissenting opinions within the Court in 2014. Topics include Neuberger's development of a collegiate judicial bench, the number of Supreme Court cases containing dissenting...

  • Courts... authority to sterilize.  // American Bar Association Journal;Aug81, Vol. 67 Issue 8, p1043 

    Presents a ruling by the Supreme Court of Alaska stating that Alaska's superior court has inherent parens patriae authority to order sterilization of a mental incompetent. Details of the case involving a 19-year-old women with Down's syndrome; Excerpts from the court's ruling opinion; Excerpts...

  • Dissenting Opinion of Justice of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine V. I. Shyshkin Regarding the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 16-rp of June 10, 2010 (Case of the Parliamentary Control of Combating Organized Crime). Shyshkin, V. I. // Statutes & Decisions: The Laws of the USSR & Its Successor State;Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p63 

    The article discusses the dissenting opinion of Justice of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (CCU) V. I. Shyshkin regarding the decision of the CCU No. 16-rp of June 10, 2010 involving parliamentary control of combating organized crime. The CCU No. 16-rp declared unconstitutional a series of...

  • DISSENTING BY DECIDING. Gerken, Heather K. // Stanford Law Review;May2005, Vol. 57 Issue 6, p1745 

    Analyzes the factors that makes decisional dissent different from usual understanding of dissent under the law in the U.S. Definition of dissent; Differences between the form taken by conventional and decisional dissent; Role of dissent in the improvement of democratic decision-making.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics