Cable's Brewing Up a Simulcast Storm

Stump, Matt
May 2005
Multichannel News;5/23/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 21, p73
Focuses on the initiatives of the cable industry to implement digital simulcast architectures in the U.S. in 2005. Plan of Comcast Corp. to launch digital simulcast; Influence of competitive pressure on the decision of cable providers to offer digital simulcast; Technological applications need to offer digital simulcast.


Related Articles

  • I Want My MTV (but no HDTV, thanks).  // Design News;9/13/2004, Vol. 60 Issue 12, p11 

    This article focuses on DTV tuners that can receive digital signals. The American government has come up with a plan to ensure that along with the other 15 percent of TV owners who are "cable holdouts"-are able to receive high-quality, over-the-air digital broadcasts. Under the FCC rule, all TVs...

  • Conquering the Digital Wave. Hess, Mark; Kuharsky, Sergei // Multichannel News;3/1/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p49 

    Reports on the preparedness of the U.S. cable television industry in competing to meet customer needs with new digital products as of March 2004. Demand for consumer sophistication; Challenges for the industry; Recommendations for successful competition.

  • No, cable networks shouldn't be relegated to second-class status. Anstrom, Decker // Electronic Media;01/18/99, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p36 

    Argues against a proposal that would require cable systems to carry the digital signals of television stations in the United States. Must-carry rules of the Federal Communications Commission; Lack of reason to regard broadcast stations as more important than cable networks.

  • Upgrade pays off.  // Variety;9/9/2002, Vol. 388 Issue 4, p21 

    Reports on the increase in the number of digital-cable television subscribers in the U.S. in the second quarter of 2002. Number of subscribers.

  • They're must-carried away.  // Electronic Media;11/16/98, Vol. 17 Issue 47, p12 

    Editorial. Comments on the digital must-carry provision being suggested by the Gore Commission in order to make broadcasters `pay' for free digital spectrum. Public service requirements for broadcasters; Perception that the cable industry, not broadcasters will foot the bill; Tying public...

  • Family Tiering Gets Technical. Dickson, Glen // Broadcasting & Cable;12/19/2005, Vol. 135 Issue 54, p24 

    The article deals with the challenges posed by the requirement for U.S. cable operators to launch family-friendly programs. Problems await cable operators with cable systems that are not yet converted to digital due to the fact that digital channels can be easily arranged into a programming...

  • UTAH'S UNCABLE SURPRISE. Kerschbaumer, Ken; Higgins, John M. // Broadcasting & Cable;1/12/2004, Vol. 134 Issue 2, p1 

    Reports on the launch of a mini wireless cable system, the U.S. Digital Television (USDTV), using the spare digital television capacity of local TV stations in Utah in 2004. Features of the DTV system; Initial cable lineup; Remarks from USDTV president Steve Lindsley on the initiative.

  • Cable Should Pay for DTV Signal. Ostroff, Nat // Broadcasting & Cable;1/19/2004, Vol. 134 Issue 3, p49 

    Comments on the need of cable operators to pay for DTV signal in the U.S. Reception of TV signals; Reason for the willingness of broadcasters to use services without due compensation; Criticism on cable's use of DTV product.

  • Research.  // CableFAX Daily;2/1/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 21, p2 

    The article reports on a study on the interest of cable subscribers to VOD in the U.S. in 2006. It cites the market penetration of digital cable television. A correlation between cable customer satisfaction and VOD is revealed.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics