Group-based reasons for action

Woodard, Christopher
June 2003
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Jun2003, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p215
Academic Journal
This article endorses a familiar, albeit controversial, argument for the existence of group-based reasons for action, but then rejects two doctrines which other advocates of such reasons usually accept. One such doctrine is the willingness requirement, which says that a group-based reason exists only if (sufficient) other members of the group in question are willing to cooperate. Thus the paper argues that there is sometimes a reason, which derives from the rationality of some group action, to play one's part unilaterally in that group action. This seems implausible only because we tend wrongly to accept a second doctrine, monism about the unit of agency. Monism claims that, for any given deliberative problem, there is only one unit of agency to which reasons attach. If we are monists who believe in group-based reasons, the willingness requirement will seem necessary in order to avoid recklessness. We should reject monism, and if we do so we can recognise genuine conflict between individual-based and group-based reasons, and in doing so we can explain, without endorsing the willingness requirement, why we should not act recklessly.


Related Articles

  • Getting it right. Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer; Grimm, Stephen // Philosophical Studies;Nov2013, Vol. 166 Issue 2, p329 

    Truth monism is the idea that only true beliefs are of fundamental epistemic value. The present paper considers three objections to truth monism, and argues that, while the truth monist has plausible responses to the first two objections, the third objection suggests that truth monism should be...

  • EXPLANATORY EPIPHENOMENALISM. C ampbell, N eil // Philosophical Quarterly;Jul2005, Vol. 55 Issue 220, p437 

    I propose a new form of epiphenomenalism, ‘explanatory epiphenomenalism’, the view that the identification of A's mental properties does not provide a causal explanation of A's behaviour. I arrive at this view by showing that although anomalous monism does not entail type...

  • A CRITIQUE OF THE DIALECTICS OF GLOBALIZATION. Okoro, Chiedozie // Journal of International Social Research;Jan2011, Vol. 4 Issue 16, p323 

    This paper is an attempt to critique the dialectics of globalization. By the dialectics of globalization, we simply mean the philosophical temperament which propels the idea of globalization. Fundamentally, all existing world philosophies can be reduced to three basic foundations which are...

  • Pushing dualism to an extreme: On the philosophical impetus of a new materialism. Dolphijn, Rick; Tuin, Iris // Continental Philosophy Review;Nov2011, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p383 

    This article discusses the way in which a group of contemporary cultural theorists in whose work we see a 'new materialism' (a term coined by Braidotti and DeLanda) at work constitutes a philosophy of difference by traversing the dualisms that form the backbone of modernist thought. Continuing...

  • Dispositional monism, relational constitution and quiddities. Barker, Stephen // Analysis;Apr2009, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p242 

    The article discusses the concept of dispositional monism, relational constitution and quiddities. The author considers dispositional monism (DM) as the view that all natural properties have their identities fixed by their dispositional functions through the patterns of stimulus and response. He...

  • dualism Philosophy.  // Dictionary of Theories;2002, p161 

    Information on the term "dualism" is presented. It refers to any view which analyzes a given subject-matter, be it the universe as a whole or some area of concern, in terms of two fundamentally distinct and opposed ideas.

  • BUCK-PASSING AND THE WRONG KIND OF REASONS. Olson, Jonas // Philosophical Quarterly;Apr2004, Vol. 54 Issue 215, p295 

    According to T.M. Scanlon's buck-passing account of value, to be valuable is not to possess intrinsic value as a simple and unanalysable property, but rather to have other properties that provide reasons to take up an attitude in favour of their owner or against it. The 'wrong kind of reasons'...

  • 'Why has economics turned out this way?' A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics. Heise, Arne // Journal of Philosophical Economics;Autumn2016, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p81 

    Economic science has - lamented by some, applauded by others - turned into a monistic discipline. In this short research note, a socio-economic answer to the question of why this has happened is provided by combining an economic approach to the market for economic ideas with a sociological...

  • Modal Rationalism and Modal Monism. Anand Vaidya // Erkenntnis;Mar2008, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p191 

    Abstract  Modal rationalism includes the thesis that ideal primary positive conceivability entails primary possibility. Modal monism is the thesis that the space of logically possible worlds is coextensive with the space of metaphysically possible worlds. In this paper I explore the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics