TITLE

More lives, better lives

AUTHOR(S)
Belshaw, Christopher
PUB. DATE
June 2003
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Jun2003, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p127
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Although many people believe that more people would be better, arguments intended to show this are unconvincing. I consider one of Parfit's arguments for a related conclusion, that even when both are worth living, we ought to prefer the better of two lives. Were this argument successful, or so I claim, then it would follow that more people would be better. But there aren't reasons for preferring the better of two lives. Nor is an attempted rejoinder effective. We can agree that there aren't reasons for preferring the better of two lives, and yet still maintain there are reasons for improving lives.
ACCESSION #
17020119

 

Related Articles

  • A Royal Road to Consequentialism? Peterson, Martin // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Apr2010, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p153 

    To consequentialise a moral theory means to account for moral phenomena usually described in nonconsequentialist terms, such as rights, duties, and virtues, in a consequentialist framework. This paper seeks to show that all moral theories can be consequentialised. The paper distinguishes between...

  • Alternative Actions and the Spirit of Consequentialism. Bykvist, Krister // Philosophical Studies;Jan2002, Vol. 107 Issue 1, p45 

    The simple idea behind act-consequentialism is that we ought to choose the action whose outcome is better than that of any alternative action. In a recent issue of this journal, Erik Carlson has argued that given a reasonable interpretation of alternative actions this simple idea cannot be...

  • Rule-Consequentialism‘s Dilemma. Law, Iain // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Sep1999, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p263 

    This paper examines recent attempts to defend Rule-Consequentialism against a traditional objection. That objection takes the form of a dilemma, that either Rule-Consequentialism collapses into Act-Consequentialism or it is incoherent. Attempts to avoid this dilemma based on the idea that using...

  • Context, Character and Consequentialist Friendships. Upton, Candace L. // Utilitas;Sep2008, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p334 

    One prevailing objection to consequentialism holds that the consequentialist cannot promote both agent-neutral value and her own personal friendships: the consequentialist cannot be a genuine friend. Several versions of this objection have been advanced, but an even more sophisticated version of...

  • Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. McElwee, Brian // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Aug2011, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p457 

    Consequentialism is often charged with demandingness objections which arise in response to the theory's commitment to impartiality. It might be thought that the only way that consequentialists can avoid such demandingness objections is by dropping their commitment to impartialism. However, I...

  • The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act-Utilitarianism. WOODARD, CHRISTOPHER // Utilitas;Jun2013, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p246 

    This article proposes a way of understanding Kantianism, act-utilitarianism and some other important ethical theories according to which they are all versions of the same kind of theory, sharing a common structure. I argue that this is a profitable way to understand the theories discussed. It is...

  • The Moral Oracle's Test. Hansson, Sven // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Aug2014, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p643 

    When presented with a situation involving an agent's choice between alternative actions, a moral oracle says what the agent is allowed to do. The oracle bases her advice on some moral theory, but the nature of that theory is not known by us. The moral oracle's test consists in determining...

  • Prerogatives Without Restrictions? Das, Ramon // Philosophical Studies;Jun2000, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p347 

    Discusses the dilemma relating to hybrid theory. Theory's rejection of consequentialism; Comparison to dominant modes of contemporary moral theorizing; Ways in which consequantialist theories demand too much of individuals; Problems with moral theory.

  • Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism. Carlson, Erik // Philosophical Studies;Dec1999, Vol. 96 Issue 3, p253 

    This article focuses on literature on utilitarianism. For a long time, it appears, the internal structure of consequentialism was regarded as relatively unproblematic. During the last two or three decades, however, such structural questions have received much more attention. Classical...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics