TITLE

Auto giants pass the pain to publishers

AUTHOR(S)
Halliday, Jean; Fine, Jon
PUB. DATE
May 2005
SOURCE
Advertising Age;5/2/2005, Vol. 76 Issue 18, Preceding p1
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the decline of advertisement in magazines by automobile companies based in Detroit, Michigan. Reason for the move of General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group to reduce their advertising expenses; Percentage of drop of magazine advertisement of the automobile companies; Optimism of several magazine publishers that he trend will not continue.
ACCESSION #
16950385

 

Related Articles

  • Detroit 3 gut spending on Time Inc. magazine ads. Ives, Nat // Automotive News;2/5/2007, Vol. 81 Issue 6241, p80 

    The article reports on the automotive companies which have reduced their print advertising budget on Time Inc. magazine. Detroit 3 automaker have decreased their promotional spending by more than $100 million in 2006. Furthermore, General Motors Corp. and DaimlerChrysler AG have also minimized...

  • This can be a risky business. Crain, Keith // Automotive News;3/20/2006, Vol. 80 Issue 6194, p12 

    This article reports that the American Family Association have reinstituted a boycott against Ford Motor Co. because Ford is advertising in some gay magazines. The association projects that to mean that Ford is supporting a gay agenda. Boycotts like this one are ridiculous. The American Family...

  • It's time to view the auto world objectively. Lutz, Robert A. // Automotive News;1/12/2004, Vol. 78 Issue 6075, p8M 

    Magazines have a real impact, offering a shelf life like no other medium. For marketers, magazine advertising delivers a precisely tailored and well-developed message to the audience in ways that television can't. In recent decades, the media have created a two-class society for automobiles,...

  • Why `Automobile' has no GM ads. Serafin, Raymond // Advertising Age;5/4/1992, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p53 

    The article discusses the decision of General Motors Corp. to withdraw its advertising placements in "Automobile Magazine" in May 1992. There are speculations that the move company's retaliation for a speech by David E. Davis Jr., editor-publication director of the car enthusiast monthly. A...

  • Ford, Chevrolet raise the ad ante in race for No. 1. Serafin, Raymond // Advertising Age;9/24/1990, Vol. 61 Issue 39, p3 

    Reports that rivals Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Corp's subsidiary Chevrolet have accelerated their marketing initiatives as part of the race for the 1990 sales leadership in the automobile industry in the U.S. Extra funding provided by Ford for its dealer groups to boost advertisements;...

  • Auto marketers take the wheel on Driver TV. Atkinson, Claire // Automotive News;10/24/2005, Vol. 80 Issue 6173, p30N 

    This article reports that General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG are using video-on-demand technology to create virtual showrooms that will display their vehicles to cable TV viewers. The companies are subscribers to Driver TV, an on-demand channel that launches this month....

  • Toyota gets the best return on ad dollars. Johnson, Bradley // Automotive News;4/10/2006, Vol. 80 Issue 6197, p30D 

    The article presents information on automotive advertising spending. According to an Advertising Age analysis, car companies spent an average of $630 to advertise each new vehicle they sold last year. Average spending on factory incentives fell by $63 in 2005, to $2,539 per vehicle. Combined...

  • Incentive plans changed ad equation. Connelly, Mary // Automotive News;9/25/2006 Supplement, Vol. 81, p88 

    The article focuses on the impact of the employee discount pricing programs launched by Detroit, Michigan-based DaimlerChrysler AG, General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. on the traditional advertising roles of the automaker and their dealers. Critics of the programs have said that they have...

  • Automotive.  // Brandweek;10/17/2005, Vol. 46 Issue 37, pSR8 

    Presents information on the magazine advertising of several automotive companies in the U.S. in 2005. General Motors Corp.; Ford Motor Co.; Toyota Motor Corp.; Nissan Motor Corp.; DaimlerChrysler.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics