Smith, Moy Pettman
April 2005
Lawyer;4/18/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 15, p12
Trade Publication
The article focuses on a trial of David Moy v Pettman Smith. David Moy fractured his leg playing football and instructed solicitors Pettman Smith to claim against the health authority for negligence following an operation. The health authority admitted liability, but medical evidence supporting Moy's continuing disability and its cause was not served in time. Pettman Smith's application for leave to adduce additional evidence and to adjourn the trial was refused at first instance and on appeal. The trial was set for April 1998 and the intention was to apply again for leave.


Related Articles

  • Analysis of Recent Attempts to Assert Medical Negligence Claims 'Outside' Texas's Article 4590i. Wilkerson, Glen M.; Davis, David M.; Cleveland, Wes; Young, Michael P. // Review of Litigation;Summer2001, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p657 

    Examines efforts to renew medical negligence claims provisions under Article 4590i in the 1977 Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act (MLIIA) in Texas. Illustration of the common law system at work under the article; Limitations detailed in the article's provisions; Disputes on...

  • THE "TYRANNY OF THE EYEWITNESS". Patterson, Brooke Whisonant // Law & Psychology Review;Spring2004, Vol. 28, p195 

    Examines the growing crisis of inaccurate witness testimony going undetected by jurors. Eyewitness errors and juror misperceptions of witness testimony; Different variables and their relationship with eyewitness confidence; Psychological analysis of external and internal factors that affect...

  • Making Experts Matter. Levy, Harlan A. // Litigation;Spring2008, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p24 

    The article discusses the significance of expert witnesses on presenting evidences on trial in the U.S. It states that expert testimony can be a unique tool in presenting evidence simply and persuasively. Expert testimony presents several distinct evidentiary opportunities such as presenting a...

  • Evidentiary Surprises and Ethical Dilemmas. Shudofsky, Sara L. // Litigation;Spring2008, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p45 

    The article discusses the evidentiary surprises and ethical dilemma on developing evidence on trials in the U.S. It states that unexpected evidentiary challenges that feature an ethical dimension can be annoying, however, awareness of some of the ethical issues arises in developing evidence will...

  • Instructing Jurors. Heuer, Larry; Penrod, Steven D. // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);Dec1989, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p409 

    This field experiment examines the advantages and disadvantages of two jury instruction procedures: instructing the jury prior to the evidence portion of the trial and providing the jury with a written copy of the judge's instructions to take with them to their deliberations. The presence or...

  • Revolving Trapdoors: Preserving Sufficiency Review of the Civil Jury After Unitherm and Amended Rule 50. Childress, Steven Alan // Review of Litigation;Spring2007, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p239 

    The article examines several procedural lapses and possible traps at trial that may negatively affect jury review for sufficiency of evidence in the U.S. It cites a Supreme Court case wherein the total-waiver result is considered as a practice with a hefty price tag, but can be avoided by making...

  • JUDICIAL FICTIONS: THE SUPREME COURT'S QUEST FOR GOOD SCIENCE. Jasanoff, Sheila // Society;May/Jun2001, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p27 

    This article discusses the use of scientific evidence in the supreme court. In place of allowing alternative scientific explanations to unfold before a jury, the new vision asks for technical evidence to be developed out of reach of lay skepticism and adversarial confrontation, in judicially...

  • THE ATTENUATION EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE: A STUDY IN ATTENUATED PRINCIPLE AND DISSIPATED LOGIC. Stratton, Brent D. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring1984, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p139 

    This article examines the court's use of the attenuation exception to admit illegally obtained evidence at trial against criminal defendants. Courts cite the following passage in the case Nardone v. United States as the origin of the attenuation exception: "Sophisticated argument may prove a...

  • Laying Foundations. McElhaney, James W. // ABA Journal;Apr90, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p86 

    Provides tips on laying evidentiary foundations in United States trials. Using the pretrial conference as the venue for laying foundations; Advantageous use of the Requests for Admissions under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Creating a checklist of every foundation to be laid...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics