Divine omniscience and knowledge de se

Nagasawa, Yujin
April 2003
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2003, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p73
Academic Journal
Patrick Grim argues that God cannot be omniscient because no one other than me can acquire knowledge de se of myself. In particular, according to Grim, God cannot know what I know in knowing that I am making a mess. I argue, however, that given two plausible principles regarding divine attributes there is no reason to accept Grim's conclusion that God cannot be omniscient. In this paper I focus on the relationship between divine omniscience and necessary impossibilities, in contrast to the general trend of research since Aquinas, which has concentrated on the relationship between divine omnipotence and necessary impossibilities.


Related Articles

  • A Grim Semantics For Logics of Belief. Steinsvold, Christopher // Journal of Philosophical Logic;Feb2008, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p45 

    Patrick Grim has presented arguments supporting the intuition that any notion of a totality of truths is incoherent. We suggest a natural semantics for various logics of belief which reflect Grim’s intuition. The semantics is a topological semantics, and we suggest that the $$T_{1} $$...

  • Friendly Atheism, Skeptical Theism, and the Problem of Evil. Rowe, William // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p79 

    The article talks about atheism, theism, and the problem of evil. A work has been published describing a particular example of evil. It focuses on a fawn being horribly burned in a fire caused by lightning, and suffering terribly for 5 days before death ended its life. It argues that God could...

  • Theism, possible worlds, and the multiverse. Kraay, Klaas // Philosophical Studies;Feb2010, Vol. 147 Issue 3, p355 

    God is traditionally taken to be a perfect being, and the creator and sustainer of all that is. So, if theism is true, what sort of world should we expect? To answer this question, we need an account of the array of possible worlds from which God is said to choose. It seems that either there is...

  • Embracing and/or Refusing God-Talk. BRUEGGEMANN, WALTER // Tikkun;Summer2014, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p49 

    The article discusses the notion of God and issues concerning God-talk. Topics covered include the integration of the God of biblical faith with a narrative account of reality, the role of God as an agent of restoration and judgment, factors that play a role in the process of faith, the struggle...

  • Divine Creation, Modal Collapse, and the Theistic Multiverse. Lougheed, Kirk // Sophia;Dec2014, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p435 

    Either a 'best world' scenario is true or a 'no best world' scenario is true. In a 'best world' scenario, God actualizes a world that is unsurpassable. In a 'no best world' scenario, for any possible world God actualizes, God could have actualized a better world. A 'no best world' scenario...

  • God and the Hypothesis of No Prime Worlds. Kraay, Klaas // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p49 

    Many theists hold that for any world x that God has the power to actualize, there is a better world, y, that God had the power to actualize instead of x. Recently, however, it has been suggested that this scenario is incompatible with traditional theism: roughly, it is claimed that no being can...

  • EXISTENÅ¢A NECESARA A LUI DUMNEZEU. Swinburne, Richard // Review of Contemporary Philosophy;Jan2008, Vol. 7, p69 

    It follows not merely from general philosophical considerations, but from the very nature of Theism itself, that God is not a logically necessary being. The claim that God exists necessarily may be read in either or two ways - either as saying „there is a divine being‟ expresses a...

  • Must All be Saved? A Kierkegaardian Response to Theological Universalism. Mulder, Jack // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p1 

    In this paper, I consider how a Kierkegaardian could respond critically to the question of strong theological universalism, i.e., the belief that all individuals must eventually be reconciled to God and experience everlasting happiness. A Kierkegaardian would likely reject what Thomas Talbott...

  • Taking consciousness seriously: A defense of Cartesian dualism. Dilley, Frank B. // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Jun2004, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p135 

    The purpose of this paper is to defend what is standardly called Cartesian dualism, as it has been modified over time since Descartes. This view of the self is derived from the examination of consciousness as one is aware of it directly, but does have interesting relationships with western...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics