TITLE

Antivaccine advocates line up to support airman

AUTHOR(S)
Cairney, Richard
PUB. DATE
March 1999
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;3/23/99, Vol. 160 Issue 6, p883
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on Canadian Sergeant Michael Kipling's refusal to take anthrax vaccine while serving in the Persian Gulf in 1998. His claims that he became ill with nonspecific illnesses that have since been called Gulf war syndrome; The armed force's decision to launch court martial proceedings; Kipling's belief that there is a link between vaccines and the Gulf war syndrome; Groups that support his decision, including the Eagle Foundation; Comments from Lieutenant-Colonel Greg Cook.
ACCESSION #
1682149

 

Related Articles

  • THE AMERICAN MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM. Roan, James B.; Buxton, Cynthia // Air Force Law Review;2002, Vol. 52, p185 

    Discusses the necessity and merits of the military justice system in the U.S. Definition and operation of the military justice system in the country; Details of pretrial investigation, pretrial confinement and preferral of charges; Information on summary court martial.

  • The `Good Soldier' Defense: Character Evidence and Military Rank at Courts-Martial. Hillman, Elizabeth Lutes // Yale Law Journal;Jan99, Vol. 108 Issue 4, p879 

    Analyzes the good soldier defense, an accused servicemember's introduction of evidence of good military character in order to convince a military judge or jury that the accused did not commit the offense charge. Legal and public policy justifications for the good soldier defense; Discussion on...

  • New Developments in Posttrial: Once More Unto The Breach, Dear Friends, Once More![1]. MacDonnell, Timothy C. // Army Lawyer;May2000, Issue 330, p90 

    Discusses efforts to address errors in the post-trial review process in United States courts-martial.

  • Military Justice At 50. Holland, Robert F. // Army Magazine;May2000, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p43 

    Focuses on military trials in the United States, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which defines military crimes, procedures for trial and punishment. Trials by special or general court-martial; Military trial procedures for not guilty pleads; Sentencing procedures at court-martials.

  • The U.S. Air Force will hold...  // Aviation Week & Space Technology;2/21/2000, Vol. 152 Issue 8, p39 

    States that the United States Air Force will hold a nonjudicial punishment hearing for Sonnie Bates, who has refised to participate in the US Defense Department's anthrax vaccination program. Bates as a pilot at Dover Air Force Bates in Delaware; Bates' agreement to a less formal disciplinary...

  • Civilian Military Contractors on Trial: The Case for Upholding the Amended Exceptional Jurisdiction Clause of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. SNYDER, DAVID L. // Texas International Law Journal;Fall/Winter2008, Vol. 44 Issue 1/2, p65 

    The article provides information on the normative model for contractor accountability such as in the issues concerning the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) in the U.S. It argues that the changes in the UCMJ should survive constitutional attack and subjecting employees to practical means...

  • The Rise and Fall of Post-Trial--Is It Time for the Legislature to Give Us All Some Clemency? Hammer, John A. // Army Lawyer;Dec2007, Issue 415, p1 

    The article offers information on the viability and efficacy of the military post-trial process for the Armed Forces in the United States. Details related to the development of the post-trial process and military justice system, judicial activism in the post-trial arena, and the rate of clemency...

  • PRAYER AT STAFF MEETINGS.  // Reporter;Dec2004, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p13 

    The article reports that the issue of prayer at mandatory formations surfaces periodically. A recent court case has raised the issue of prayer at mandatory formations, to include staff meetings. There are several significant factual differences in the case as it applies to the military. People...

  • Supreme Court won't speed up terrorism case.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);12/10/2004, Vol. 51 Issue 58, p4B 

    Reports that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to speed up consideration of an unusual appeal that challenges the government's plans for military trials for foreign terror suspects in December 2004. Details of the appeal; Summary of the ruling; Rationale behind the government's plan to subject...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics