TITLE

CALIFORNIA

PUB. DATE
April 2005
SOURCE
Broker Magazine;Apr/May2005, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the California Supreme Court held that California's anti-predatory lending law pre-empts Oakland's predatory lending ordinance. The ruling is good news for California, according to the American Financial Services Association, which brought the case against the city of Oakland, because it means that legitimate subprime lenders can remain in business. Lenders who serve higher-risk borrowers will be able to operate with parity throughout the state of California avoiding the balkanization of the regulatory landscape.
ACCESSION #
16712811

 

Related Articles

  • AFSA Wins a Review of Oakland's Predatory Ordinance. Harmon, Jennifer // National Mortgage News;1/12/2004, Vol. 28 Issue 16, p2 

    Reports that the California Supreme will review the American Financial Service Association's (AFSA) appeal in its case against a predatory lending ordinance encated in 2001 by the city of Oakland. Basis of the decision of the Supreme Court; Facts of the case; Assertion of AFSA on the case.

  • State Supreme Court to hear Prop. 8 lawsuits.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;11/20/2008, Issue 1091, p10 

    The article reports that the State Supreme Court has agreed to hear several lawsuits to the Proposition 8, a same-sex marriage ban in San Francisco, California.

  • Brokers who focus on customers will succeed. Baxter, Nick // Mortgage Strategy;3/24/2008, p27 

    The author reflects on the move of mortgage portfolio buyers taking action against originating lenders on the basis that the original lending did not comply with the institutions' lending policies or was negligent in Great Britain. He states that the simple equation is that the bigger the firm...

  • Notes.  // California Law Review;Sep25, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p483 

    Discusses the constitutionality of the law permitting corporations to issue no par value stock as implicated in the California Supreme Court's decision on the case Del Monte Light and Power Co. v. Jordan. Analysis of the court's reasoning; Effect of the decision upon domestic corporations...

  • A Little Rationality From California Supreme Court.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;01/22/2001, Vol. 246 Issue 3, p52 

    Editorial. Commends the California Supreme Court for injecting a little rationality into the state's growing construction litigation market. Terms of the court's ruling in the case 'Aas v. Superior Court'; Implications of the ruling for contractors in the state.

  • How Far May a State Labor Law Reach? Munoz, William A.; Ruzicka, Kerri L. // Employment & Labor Relations Law;Winter2012, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p2 

    The article discusses the court case Sullivan v. Oracle Corp. in which the California Supreme Court held that nonexempt employees who do not live in California must be paid overtime under the state's overtime laws for work performed in California. The court held that rest and meal periods,...

  • California Ruling.  // Erie Gay News;Jun2008, p13 

    The article reports on the ruling of the California Supreme Court on May 15, 2008 that the state can no longer exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage. The National Center for Lesbian Rights represented 14 same-sex couples as well as Equality California and Our Family Coalition in the case....

  • California high court affirms partner rights at businesses. Szymanski, Zak // Bay Area Reporter;8/4/2005, Vol. 35 Issue 31, p14 

    Reports on the decision of the California Supreme Court in Koebke versus Bernardo Heights Country Club. Affirmation of LGBT couples rights at businesses; Details of the case; Distinction between registered domestic partners and other unmarried couples and individuals; Intention of the...

  • Life for indecent exposure a bit much, says court.  // Advocate;1/3/73, Issue 102, p17 

    Announces that a case of indecent exposure in which California authorities were considering a life sentence has brought a rebuke from the State Supreme Court. Trial of John Lynch, charged with indecent exposure; Validity of the ruling against John Lynch.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics