Zoning Battle Not Over

Rockwell, Mark
April 2005
Wireless Week;4/1/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p19
Trade Publication
Focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on The City of Rancho Palos Verdes vs. Abrams court case in California in 2005. Background on the case; Implications of the ruling on the wireless tower zoning issues hounding the U.S. telecommunications industry.


Related Articles

  • Court rules in favor of Friends of San Diego in 301 University case. Hope, Randy // Gay & Lesbian Times;8/30/2007, Issue 1027, p14 

    The article reports on the Supreme Court ruling on the suit filed by the opponents of the proposed 12-story condominium and retail project in Hillcrest which is approved by the City of San Diego, California in September 2006. Judge Linda Quinn voided the City Council's approval of the proposed...

  • Eminent Domain: New London's Story. Brown, Richard // Public Management (00333611);Dec2005, Vol. 87 Issue 11, p7 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in "Kelo v. City of New London," in which the court ruled that New London could take privately owned properties for private sector development under its economic revitalization plan. In New London, 55 percent of the land area is tax-exempt....

  • Miami Beach: Receded, Revised, and Reaffirmed. Reid, Robert C.; Breth, Jason M. // Florida Bar Journal;Feb2009, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p18 

    The article reports on the decision of the Supreme Court on the cases Strand v. Escambia County, Bay County v. Town of Cedar Grove and City of Parker v. State in Florida. The bright-line principle applied in the landmark case of State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency was upheld. The court...

  • CITY RESIDENT PREFERENCE UPHELD.  // Labor Law Journal;Apr83, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p207 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case "White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers," that a city was entitled to require that at least one-half of those working on city-funded construction projects be city residents. The Court overturned a ruling...

  • SUPREMES' BIRD CALL. McClintock, Pamela // Daily Variety;6/18/2002, Vol. 276 Issue 12, p6 

    Reports that in a lawsuit filed by Charlie Ergen of EchoStar and the Satellite Broadcasting & Communication Association (SBCA), the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 2002 let stand a federal law requiring satellite broadcasters to carry either all the local broadcasting signals in a market or none...

  • Laying Down the Law.  // Broadcasting & Cable;7/28/2014, Vol. 144 Issue 27, p36 

    The author offers insights on the 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision involving Internet streaming regulations and operations in the U.S.

  • High Court to review 'Brand X'  // CED;Jan2005, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p8 

    The article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court case. The Court agreed in December 2004, to a weigh in on the decision on whether cable modem service providers must provide access to competing, third-party Internet Service Providers. The court said it would review the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of...

  • Bans on local telecom service are upheld. Ursery, Stephen // American City & County;May2004, Vol. 119 Issue 5, p16 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding state laws that prohibit local governments from offering telecommunications services in March 2004. Background of the case; Rationale behind the judgment; Confusion over the services classified as telecommunications.

  • Important Cases of the Supreme Court.  // Monkeyshines on the United States Government;2001, p50 

    Outlines several important cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. Details of the case between Marbury versus Madison; Relevance of the case of McCulloch versus Maryland; Impact of the ruling on the case of Plassy versus Ferguson.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics