TITLE

An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system

AUTHOR(S)
Kozlowski, L. I.; Dreschel, N. A.; Stellman, S. D.; Wilkenfeld, J.; Weiss, E. B.; Goldberg, M. E.
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Tobacco Control;Feb2005, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p64
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: The Barclay cigarette (Brown & Williamson) was introduced in 1980 in the USA in the most expensive launch in history. In the USA and around the world, Barclay was later determined to have a grooved filter design that was compromised by human smokers in the normal act of smoking, but that was measured as ultra-low tar using the standard tar testing protocol. Objectives: To evaluate whether Brown & Williamson knew of the compensatability of Barclay during the design process and before it was released; to evaluate initial responses of competing tobacco companies to Barclay, before complaints were made to the Federal Trade Commission in 1981. Methods: Internet databases of industry documents (Tobacco Documents Online, Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, Brown & Williamson Litigation discovery website, Guildford and major company websites) were searched using key words, key dates, and targeted searches. Documents related specifically to the development, evaluation and release of the Barclay cigarette and related to the responses by competing tobacco companies were examined. Results: Documents indicate the manufacturer was aware of Barclay design problems and was planning, before release, to respond to criticism. Competing companies quickly detected the filter groove stratagem and considered developing their own similar filter, but eventually backed off. Conclusion: The design problems with Barclay were readily understood by cigarette manufacturers, including the maker of Barclay, before official governmental evaluations occurred. Testing involving measured exposures to human smokers may in the end be crucial to identifying problems with novel cigarette designs.
ACCESSION #
16539537

 

Related Articles

  • Blowing smoke.  // Advertising Age;11/12/2001, Vol. 72 Issue 46, p26 

    This article presents a viewpoint regarding Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp.'s advertisement for Advance cigarettes that purportedly contain less toxins than conventional cigarettes. Claims of "less risk" and "less toxicity" rely more on hope and less on science.

  • Three faces of Kool. Dagnoli, Judann // Advertising Age;10/14/1991, Vol. 62 Issue 44, p54 

    Reports on a national advertising campaign created by Campbell-Mithun-Esty for the Kool cigarette brand of Brown amp; Williamson Tobacco Corp. in 1991. Lines carried by the campaign; Description of the campaign; Brands that were renamed. INSET: Tobacco shops play tug of war.

  • Confidential Settlement Agreements and the Right to Testify. Bernaber, Lynne // Journal of Employment Discrimination Law;Winter2000, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p81 

    The article focuses on the film "The Insider," which is the Hollywood movie that got it right about how legal disputes are resolved through political struggle. The movie shows how the American public finally came to learn about the deliberate actions of tobacco companies to make cigarettes...

  • Finding the Kool Mixx: how Brown & Williamson used music marketing to sell cigarettes. Hafez, Navid; Ling, Pamela M. // Tobacco Control;Oct2006, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p359 

    Objective: To describe the history of Kool's music-themed promotions and analyse the role that music played in the promotion of the brand. Methods: Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents, legal documents, and promotional materials. Results: Brown & Williamson started Kool...

  • Smoker's New Accessory: Kool Waves. Beirne, Mike // Brandweek;06/26/2000, Vol. 41 Issue 26, p4 

    Reports the marketing of the cigarette product of Brown & Williamson Tobacco with a free radio as fashion accessory in the United States as of June 2000. Features of the radio; Basis for its inclusion of a free radio to its cigarette product.

  • Trying to keep Kool with under-30s. Beardi, Cara // Advertising Age;5/21/2001, Vol. 72 Issue 21, p14 

    Reports on the efforts of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. to market its Kool brand of cigarettes to consumers under the age of 30. Market share held by Kool as of May, 2001; Mention of the Kool All Access Hip-Hop Tour; Amount spent on measured media on all Kool brands in 2000; Role of Cordiant...

  • This penguin and ads are far from Kool, folks. Garfield, Bob // Advertising Age;10/21/1991, Vol. 62 Issue 45, p58 

    The article presents the author's commentary on Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.'s test campaign for Kool cigarettes. He details the failure of the campaign to attract young adult smokers. Lastly, he suggests that devising a cigarette brand image without a cartoon character is clearly impossible.

  • Netropolitan.  // New Scientist;10/31/98, Vol. 160 Issue 2158, p21 

    Presents news about Web sites about smoking and the tobacco wars as of October 1998. Mention of a class-action by smokers against the tobacco industry in the United States; Web site of the pressure group Action on Smoking and Health; Arizona Program for Nicotine and Tobacco Research; Brown and...

  • Lucky Strikes targets young males.  // Marketing News;11/04/96, Vol. 30 Issue 23, p15 

    The article reports that Lucky Strikes, the cigarette brand that went to war with young Americans in the 1940s and presented the Hit Parade in the '50s, is poised for a rebound in the market for young male smokers. That's what Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. hopes as it dusts off the recently...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics