Judge Moves SEC's Heritage Case to L.A. District Court
- SEC May Settle With Kasirer, Goldstein in Heritage Case. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;11/1/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32499, p4
The article provides updates on the securities fraud court case filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against attorneys Robert A. Kasirer and Jerold V. Goldstein. The SEC is moving toward settlement against the attorneys for allegedly misleading investors about more than...
- Guilt grip. Shapiro, Alexandra; Malionek, Robert // Lawyer;12/3/2007, Vol. 21 Issue 47, p29
The article focuses on the two US Supreme Court ruling in the area of securities litigation in the U.S. The two cases being resolved by Supreme Court includes the Tellabas versus Makor Issues & Rights and Stoneridge Investment versus Scientific-Atlanta, wherein securities fraud claim under...
- BAY ALLEGES STOCK FRAUD. Shprintz, Janet // Daily Variety;12/6/2001, Vol. 274 Issue 4, p20
Presents a lawsuit filed by director Michael Bay against his former stockbroker Win Troung in Hollywood, California. Allegation in a securities fraud lawsuit; Move of Bay in filing arbitration proceedings against Merrill Lynch; Content of the complaints.
- Supreme Court Ruling Stirs Embers Of Yield-Burning Case in Chicago. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;05/26/2000, Vol. 332 Issue 30900, p5
Reports on a yield burning case in Chicago, Illinois. Lawsuits brought by citizens against three underwriters and accountants; Decision handed down by the United States Supreme Court.
- Fifth Circuit Limits Fraud-On-the-Market Presumption. Hampton, Wallis; Johnston, Jeff; Smith, Spencer // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q2, p1
The article focuses on the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to securities fraud case Greenberg v. Crossroads Systems Inc. Plaintiffs alleged that Crossroads made public misrepresentations regarding its router products. The Court rejected plaintiffs' argument that they...
- Abuse of Justice. Shariff, M. Y. // Economic & Political Weekly;6/28/2014, Vol. 49 Issue 26/27, p5
Two letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Akshardham Judgment I: The Law at Work" by Ravi Nair and "Akshardam: Judgment II: Between Callousness and Complicity" by Saurav Datta in the June 21, 2014 issue.
- Court of Appeal to rule on Brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Dyer, Clare // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/10/1986, Vol. 292 Issue 6530, p1242
Focuses on the court case on brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Ruling of the Court of Appeals on the case; Notification of retirement; Recollection of previous High Court decision.
- Excerpts From Ruling in Richmond V. J.A. Croson Company. // Education Week;2/1/1989, Vol. 8 Issue 19, p20
Several excerpts from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in "City of Richmond versus J.A. Croson Co." are presented.
- Cornell studies double standard on appeal. // Nation's Restaurant News;8/27/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 35, p22
Reports the increasing trend of overturned court decision upon appeal favoring sued employers.