TITLE

Public Opinion and Political Philosophy: The Relation between Social-Scientific and Philosophical Analyses of Distributive Justice

AUTHOR(S)
Swift, Adam
PUB. DATE
December 1999
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Dec1999, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p337
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper considers the relation between philosophical discussions of, and social-scientific research into popular beliefs about, distributive justice. The first part sets out the differences and tensions between the two perspectives, identifying considerations which tend to lead adherents of each discipline to regard the other as irrelevant to its concerns. The second discusses four reasons why social scientists might benefit from philosophy: problems in identifying inconsistency, the fact that non-justice considerations might underlie distributive judgments, the way in which different principles of justice can yield the same concrete distributive judgments, and the ambiguity of key terms. The third part distinguishes and evaluates three versions of the claim that normative theorising about justice can profit from empirical research into public opinion: that its findings are food for thought, that they amount to feasibility constraints, and that they are constitutive of normatively justified principles of justice. The view that popular opinion about justice has a strongly constitutive role to play in justifying principles of distributive justice stricto sensu is rejected, but it is argued that what the people think (and what they can reasonably be expected to come to think) on distributive matters can be an important factor for the political theorist to take into account, for reasons of legitimacy, or feasibility, or both.
ACCESSION #
16477988

 

Related Articles

  • SOCIAL JUSTICE AND LEGAL JUSTICE. SADURSKI, WOJCIECH // Law & Philosophy;Dec1984, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p329 

    The main aim of this paper is to challenge the validity of the distinction between legal justice and social justice. It is argued that what we usually call "legal justice" is either an application of the more fundamental notion of "social justice" to legal rules and decisions or is not a matter...

  • Are Women Degenerating?  // America;1/8/1927, Vol. 36 Issue 13, p299 

    The article discusses about women and their demand for equality. The author agrees with Charles A. Richmond when he said that by attaching highly unconventional meanings to their efforts for equality with men, some women are degrading their womanhood instead of elevating it. The author also says...

  • Poll shows 58 percent back NYS marriage equality.  // Empty Closet;May2011, Issue 445, p3A 

    The article reports that a survey from the Siena Research Institute has found that 58 percent of people in New York State supports marriage equality.

  • "DILIGENCE IS THE MOTHER OF GOOD FORTUNE": EFFORT AND DESERT IN DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE. Mizrahi, Moti // Review Journal of Political Philosophy;Jun2010, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p103 

    The notion of desert seems to play an important role in accounts of retributive justice. As far as distributive justice is concerned, however, the notion of desert seems to have lost its place as a relevant notion in the debate. This is partly due to the influence of John Rawls' A Theory of...

  • Ethics and Social Science: Which Kind of Co-operation? Birnbacher, Dieter // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Dec1999, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p319 

    The relation between ethics and social science is often conceived as complementary, both disciplines cooperating in the solution of concrete moral problems. Against this, the paper argues that not only applied ethics but even certain parts of general ethics have to incorporate sociological and...

  • In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. Segall, Shlomi // Social Theory & Practice;Apr2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p177 

    The article demonstrates that the luck-egalitarian account of distributive justice does not forbid helping those who lack discretion. The author examined 6 luck-egalitarian responses to the abandonment objection. He has justified the use of treating the imprudent in defense of a theory that is...

  • From the editorial collective... Hutchings, Katherine // Social Alternatives;Oct95, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p2 

    The article offers the author's comments on various issues related to social justice and equality in Australia. Social justice, equity and equality of opportunity have become focusing issues for labor, employer groups and government alike. Despite affirmative action and anti-discrimination...

  • Just Savings and the Difference Principle. Wall, Steven // Philosophical Studies;Oct2003, Vol. 116 Issue 1, p79 

    The issue of just savings between generations presents an important, and for the most part unappreciated, problem for Rawls's theory of distributive justice. This paper argues that the just savings principle, as Rawls formulates it in his recent work, stands in tension with the difference...

  • The (Stabilized) Nash Bargaining Solution as a Principle of Distributive Justice. Moehler, Michael // Utilitas;Dec2010, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p447 

    It is argued that the Nash bargaining solution cannot serve as a principle of distributive justice because (i) it cannot secure stable cooperation in repeated interactions and (ii) it cannot capture our moral intuitions concerning distributive questions. In this article, I propose a solution to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics