TITLE

From Bodo Ethics to Distributive Justice

AUTHOR(S)
Hardin, Russell
PUB. DATE
December 1999
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Dec1999, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p399
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Concern with material equality as the central form of distributive justice is a very modern idea. Distributive justice for Aristotle and many other writers for millennia after him was a matter of distributing what each ought to get from merit or desert in some sense. Many, such as Hume, thought material equality a pernicious idea. In the medieval village life of Bodo, villagers knew enough about each other to govern relations through norms, including, when necessary, a norm of charity. In more complex modern societies, economic destitution cannot so well be handled by individual charity, but now it can be handled by states. Hence, we begin to conceive of the idea of distributive justice as driven essentially by concern for material equality. The difference in state capacities is largely epistemological: states today can know much more about their citizens.
ACCESSION #
16477979

 

Related Articles

  • The (Stabilized) Nash Bargaining Solution as a Principle of Distributive Justice. Moehler, Michael // Utilitas;Dec2010, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p447 

    It is argued that the Nash bargaining solution cannot serve as a principle of distributive justice because (i) it cannot secure stable cooperation in repeated interactions and (ii) it cannot capture our moral intuitions concerning distributive questions. In this article, I propose a solution to...

  • Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution. Anbarci, Nejat; Sun, Ching-jen // Social Choice & Welfare;Aug2011, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p453 

    Suppes-Sen dominance or SS-proofness (SSP) is a commonly accepted criterion of impartiality in distributive justice. Mariotti (Review of Economic Studies, 66, 733-741, 1999) characterized the Nash bargaining solution using Nash's (Econometrica, 18, 155-162, 1950) scale invariance (SI) axiom and...

  • Towards an Integration of the Ecological Space Paradigm and the Capabilities Approach. Peeters, Wouter; Dirix, Jo; Sterckx, Sigrid // Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics;Jun2015, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p479 

    In order to develop a model of equitable and sustainable distribution, this paper advocates integrating the ecological space paradigm and the capabilities approach. As the currency of distribution, this account proposes a hybrid of capabilities and ecological space. Although the goal of...

  • Distributive Justice. Auerbach, Michael P. // Distributive Justice -- Research Starters Sociology;4/1/2018, p1 

    This article takes an in-depth look at some of the theoretical approaches to distributive justice. The article analyzes the ideals of three general frameworks - that which requires egalitarian distribution, that which encourages individual initiative and that which focuses on the equitable...

  • MAXIMIN, UNCERTAINTY, AND THE LEISURE TRADE-OFF. Musgrave, R. A. // Quarterly Journal of Economics;Nov74, Vol. 88 Issue 4, p625 

    This article discusses the maximin, uncertainty and the leisure trade-off and its application as a rule of optimal distribution which has caught the fancy of economists in exploring its implications for redistribution policy. The underlying propositions that decisions in the original state...

  • Social Position and Distributive Justice: Experimental Evidence. Swope, Kurtis; Cadigan, John; Schmitt, Pamela; Shupp, Robert // Southern Economic Journal;Jan2008, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p811 

    Using a simple, double-blind dictator experiment, we examine the extent to which subjects' choices of distributive shares are influenced by unearned social position. We measure social position by the initial distributive shares (resources) and the subjects' ability to determine the final...

  • REPLY TO ALEXANDER AND MUSGRAVE. Rawls, John // Quarterly Journal of Economics;Nov74, Vol. 88 Issue 4, p633 

    Comments on the article "Maximin, Uncertainty and the Leisure Trade-Off." by R. A. Musgrave about theory of justice. Principles of justice versus the principle of utility; Objective of the theory of justice; Role of the principles of justice.

  • ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE: LOOKING BACK, LOOKING FORWARD. Nowakowski, Jaclyn M.; Conlon, Donald E. // International Journal of Conflict Management;2005, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p4 

    We provide a brief review of how the concept of justice has evolved over time from a single construct (distributive justice) to one represented by four constructs (distributive, procedural interpersonal, and informational justice). We then compare and contrast two recent meta-analytic views of...

  • LES PROCÉDURES D'ALLOCATION DES QUOTAS ET LA QUESTION D'ÉQUITÉ (FRANCE/EUROPE). Leseur, Alexia // Revue d'Économie Financière;Mar2006, Vol. 83, p1 

    In their National Allocation Plans, France and the other Member States disclosed the allocation of allowances to the energy and industrial sectors, and explicated their methodologies, which are based on needs. The aim of this paper is to question the equity of this distribution: we explore what...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics