Rule-Consequentialism‘s Dilemma

Law, Iain
September 1999
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Sep1999, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p263
Academic Journal
This paper examines recent attempts to defend Rule-Consequentialism against a traditional objection. That objection takes the form of a dilemma, that either Rule-Consequentialism collapses into Act-Consequentialism or it is incoherent. Attempts to avoid this dilemma based on the idea that using RC has better results than using AC are rejected on the grounds that they conflate the ideas of a criterion of rightness and a decision procedure. Other strategies, Brad Hooker‘s prominent amongst them, involving the thought that RC need contain no overarching concern to maximize the good are acknowledged to avoid the original dilemma, but lead to further problems of motivating and justifying RC in the absence of such a concern. The paper argues that Hooker‘s attempt to deal with these problems by using a ‘Reflective Equilibrium plus‘ method is unsuccessful.


Related Articles

  • Playing Dice with Morality: Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem. DOUCET, MATHIEU // Utilitas;Jun2013, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p161 

    In this article I criticize the non-consequentialist Weighted Lottery (WL) solution to the choice between saving a smaller or a larger group of people. WL aims to avoid what non-consequentialists see as consequentialism's unfair aggregation by giving equal consideration to each individual's...

  • More lives, better lives. Belshaw, Christopher // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Jun2003, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p127 

    Although many people believe that more people would be better, arguments intended to show this are unconvincing. I consider one of Parfit's arguments for a related conclusion, that even when both are worth living, we ought to prefer the better of two lives. Were this argument successful, or so I...

  • THE CONSEQUENTIALIST CAN RECOGNISE RIGHTS. Pettit, Philip // Philosophical Quarterly;Jan88, Vol. 38 Issue 150, p42 

    The article discusses philosophical research. There have been a number of attempts to show that being a consequentialist, even being a utilitarian, allows one still to recognize rights. The author believes that these efforts are well motivated, for he thinks that any moral doctrine is suspect if...

  • Smuggled into Existence: Nonconsequentialism, Procreation, and Wrongful Disability. Vrousalis, Nicholas // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Jun2013, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p589 

    The wrongful disability problem arises whenever a disability-causing, and therefore (presumptively) wrongful, procreative act is a necessary condition for the existence of a person whose life is otherwise worth living. It is a problem because it seems to involve no harm, and therefore no...

  • Alternative Actions and the Spirit of Consequentialism. Bykvist, Krister // Philosophical Studies;Jan2002, Vol. 107 Issue 1, p45 

    The simple idea behind act-consequentialism is that we ought to choose the action whose outcome is better than that of any alternative action. In a recent issue of this journal, Erik Carlson has argued that given a reasonable interpretation of alternative actions this simple idea cannot be...

  • Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. McElwee, Brian // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Aug2011, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p457 

    Consequentialism is often charged with demandingness objections which arise in response to the theory's commitment to impartiality. It might be thought that the only way that consequentialists can avoid such demandingness objections is by dropping their commitment to impartialism. However, I...

  • The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act-Utilitarianism. WOODARD, CHRISTOPHER // Utilitas;Jun2013, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p246 

    This article proposes a way of understanding Kantianism, act-utilitarianism and some other important ethical theories according to which they are all versions of the same kind of theory, sharing a common structure. I argue that this is a profitable way to understand the theories discussed. It is...

  • The Moral Oracle's Test. Hansson, Sven // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Aug2014, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p643 

    When presented with a situation involving an agent's choice between alternative actions, a moral oracle says what the agent is allowed to do. The oracle bases her advice on some moral theory, but the nature of that theory is not known by us. The moral oracle's test consists in determining...

  • Prerogatives Without Restrictions? Das, Ramon // Philosophical Studies;Jun2000, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p347 

    Discusses the dilemma relating to hybrid theory. Theory's rejection of consequentialism; Comparison to dominant modes of contemporary moral theorizing; Ways in which consequantialist theories demand too much of individuals; Problems with moral theory.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics