TITLE

CTIA Weighs in on Grokster Case

AUTHOR(S)
Rockwell, Mark
PUB. DATE
March 2005
SOURCE
Wireless Week;3/15/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p58
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the joint filing made by the Cellular and Telecom Industry Association (CTIA) with the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the copyright liability case Goldwyn-Mayer Studios versus Grokster. Background of Grokster; View of the CTIA regarding the motion picture and music industries' request to change the way the court views infringement; Way to depress capital investment in new Internet technologies.
ACCESSION #
16406471

 

Related Articles

  • A COMMENT ON NEW YORK TIMES V. TASINI. Lange, David // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Spring2003, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p653 

    Comments on the U.S. Supreme Court case 'New York Times v. Tasini' involving copyright infringement. Copyright system at large; Possibility of living without copyright altogether; Perspective of the movie industry.

  • More Heat Over RIAA Subpoenas. Holland, Bill // Billboard;9/27/2003, Vol. 115 Issue 39, p8 

    Reports on the efforts of Internet service providers to bring the Recording Industry Association of America's (RIAA) informational subpoena process to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2003. Highlights of a congressional hearing on a bill that would take away the informational subpoena from the RIAA;...

  • Ruling On Copyright Extension Leaves Foes With Little Recourse. HOLLAND, BILL // Billboard;1/25/2003, Vol. 115 Issue 4, p1 

    Discusses the Supreme Court ruling upholding the 1998 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA) in the United States. How the copyright protection was extended an extra twenty years; Consideration of public-domain material; Feelings from songwriters and composers about the decision; Views...

  • Top Court Eyes Media's Role. Shields, Todd // MediaWeek;7/11/2005, Vol. 15 Issue 27, p8 

    Reports on a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in July 2005 that software providers could be sued for inducing copyright infringement. Argument presented by the court in the decision; Importance of the ruling to the movie and television industries; Liability of media and advertising agencies...

  • Aereo Files For Bankruptcy After High Court Ruling. REINHARDT KRAUSE // Investors Business Daily;11/21/2014, p00 

    The article reports on the Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection filed by technology company Aereo Inc. It states that Aereo filed the bankruptcy protection following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on its television (TV)-over-Internet service which violated the copyrights of TV broadcasters. It...

  • COMMENT: CONTRACTING AND THE RIGHTS OF PHOTOGRAPHERS. Hecker, Joel // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Spring2003, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p659 

    Comments on the issue of contracting and the rights of photographers in the U.S. in light of the U.S. Supreme Court copyright infringement case 'New York Times Co. v. Tasini.' More direct effect of the case on authors than on photographers; Author's belief that collective licensing will not...

  • Record labels wait for Grokster verdict to join Mashboxx.  // New Media Age;11/25/2004, p3 

    This article reports on the decision of major recording companies in the U.S. to wait for a ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on an appeal of the industry against Grokster before joining the legal peer-to-peer (P2P) service launched by Mashboxx, as of November 2004. Although SonyBMG, the second...

  • Court: Web Porn Law Blocks Free Speech. Chang, Samantha // Billboard;4/17/2004, Vol. 116 Issue 16, p17 

    Reports on legal issues involving the Internet and the U.S. music industry as of April 2004. Move of the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Child Online Protection Act; Discussion on the alleged unconstitutionality of the law in relation to free speech; Request of the officials at P2P United for...

  • Grokster.  // Daily Variety;Jan2005 DVD Exclusive, p28 

    Highlights the impending decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the "MGM v. Grokster" case, concerning copyright ruling in the U.S. Facts of the case; Conflict between motion picture studios against peer-to-peer technology, which allows people to swap movies; Reference to the Betamax case in 1984.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics