George Weigel

Weigel, George
April 2005
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Apr2005, Issue 152, p11
Argues the presumption against war by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context that is, the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis or peace in the U.S. Function of the presumption among religious leaders and religious intellectuals; Role of theologians and religious leaders in decision-making about war and peace; Views of theologians and religious leaders on the use of armed force in question.


Related Articles

  • Who Wants War? An Exchange. Griffiths, Paul J. // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Apr2005, Issue 152, p10 

    Focuses on the debate about the meaning, history, and contemporary applicability of just war theory in the U.S. since the September 11 terrorist attacks. Liveliness of the Catholic tradition shown in the vigor of the debate; Concern whether the principles governing thought about when it is...

  • Kolonialism och rättfärdigt krig -- Francisco de Vitoria. Manga, Edda // Historisk Tidskrift;2008, Issue 3, p309 

    This article analyses present uses of the concept of "just war" by means of an investigation of two famous lectures by the principal natural law theorist of the sixteenth century, Francisco de Vitoria. Vitoria proposed just war as the legal basis for Spanish sovereignty over the native...

  • Just and Unjust Wars: A Diplomat's Perspective. Holbrooke, Richard // Social Research;Winter2002, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p915 

    The article discusses the author's perspectives on the moral and ethical aspects of the war headed by the U.S. The author stresses that an individual's just war can be an act of terrorism or genocide on another. Moreover, he notes that those who do murderous activities justify their actions by...

  • INSTITUTIONALIZING THE JUST WAR? A CRITICAL COMMENT ON BUCHANAN. Vinx, Lars // TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences;2007, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p382 

    I will argue that Buchanan's argument against the principle that war is permissible only in response to an actual or imminent attack rests on a mistaken understanding of the nature and purpose of the JWN. Buchanan abstracts from the fact that the JWN is not just a moral principle but also a...

  • "Are We Fighting Yet?" Can Traditional Just War Concepts Cope with Contemporary Conflict and the Changing Character of War? Whetham, David // Monist;Jan2016, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p55 

    In a time when the clear dividing lines between war and peace are challenged by new techniques and methods of conducting hostilities, it is often difficult to tell if one is in a state of war or not. Even states that do not consider themselves to be 'at war' find themselves living under...

  • `Peace' now not quits like it was in `83. Vidulich, Dorothy // National Catholic Reporter;1/7/94, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p18 

    Opinion. Discusses reactions and oppositions to the stand of the 1994 reflection statement `The Harvest of Justice Is Sown in Peace' on the just war doctrine. Comparison with 1983's `The Challenge of Peace'; Reflections' limitations; Church's view of the importance of the just war theory;...

  • Whither the 'Just War'? Christiansen, Drew // America;3/24/2003, Vol. 188 Issue 10, p7 

    Discusses the Just war doctrine as it applies to the Iraqi War. With numerous Vatican officials and Pope John Paul II himself vigorously voicing criticism of a possible war with Iraq, the United States ambassador to the Holy See and former Republican national chairman, Jim Nicholson, invited...

  • Words of War.  // Harvard International Review;Spring2004, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p36 

    Interviews Michael Walzer, professor of Social Science of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University regarding the just war theory. Benefits of military intervention; Consideration for the morality of an intervention; Use of the just war theory in decision-making and evaluation of...

  • The Principle of Sovereign Equality with Respect to Wars with Non-State Actors. Noorda, Hadassa // Philosophia;Jun2013, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p337 

    The desire to defend a state against attacks by a non-state actor requires thinking about counter-attacking without violating the sovereign equality of the territorial state because targeting a non-state actor on the territory of that state may violate its sovereignty. This paper evaluates the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics